Search Results for "Runway Construction"

21 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Writ Petition Against Tender Reinvitation for Runway Work; Arbitrary Change in 'Similar Work' Definition Alleged to Exclude Lowest Bidder

The petitioner, M/s. J. M. Mhatre Infra Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Construction Firm and HAL Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Both parties consented to appointment of arbitrator from panel of Arbitration Centre - Karnataka.

The petitioner, M/s V.K.A. Constructions Engineers & Contractors, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Airport Project Despite Procedural Lapses. Court Holds That Dispensation of Section 5A Inquiry Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Was Unjustified but Refuses to Quash Notification in Public Interest.

The two writ petitions were filed by M/s. Suretech Hospital & Research Centre Limited and M/s. Vighnaharta Builders and Developers challenging land ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Upholds Rejection of Price Escalation and Interest Claims. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contract Clause 70C and Discretion on Quantum Not Patently Illegal Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, a consortium of M/s. Valecha Engineering Limited and M/s. AMA Private Limited, entered into a contract with the respondent, Airports A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...