Search Results for "Rule 35(a)"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Banks to Comply with RBI Prudential Framework for Stressed Assets Resolution in Writ Petition by Borrower Company. The court held that the RBI circular dated June 7, 2019, is binding on banks and that the borrower has a right to seek a review meeting under the framework.

The petitioner, Ganjam Nagappa and Son Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging DICGC Act Provisions in Cooperative Bank Deposit Insurance Dispute. Sections 18A(5) and 21(3)(4) of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961, held constitutional and not arbitrary.

The appellant, Sri G.K. Gururaja Rao, Secretary of Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Banks' Appeals in RBI Fraud Classification Case Regarding Natural Justice Requirements. Court Holds No Absolute Right to Personal Hearing or Full Forensic Audit Report Disclosure Under RBI Master Directions Issued Under Section 35A Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

The dispute arose from the classification of loan accounts as 'fraud' by banks under the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions. The appellant bank...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging RBI Circular on Resolution of Stressed Assets. Circular dated 12.02.2018 held to be valid and within RBI's powers under Sections 35A and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

The petitioners, Jayaswal Neco Industries Limited and Jayaswal Holdings Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Execution of Foreign Court's Costs Order. Foreign judgment imposing costs is a decree enforceable under Section 44A of CPC, 1908, and the executing court cannot go behind the decree.

The Petitioner, M/s. Alcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 15th April, 2011 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Nashik, which rej...