Search Results for "Residential premises"

1178 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1178 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Suit — Confirms Findings of Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Upheld as Tenants Failed to Prove Bona Fide Use and Consent for Subletting.

The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning Shop No.2 and rear portion of Shop No.1 in Supariwala Mansion, Parel, Mumbai. The original p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Concurrent Findings in Tenancy Declaration Suit. Applicant fails to prove membership of deceased tenant's family or residence in suit premises under Section 7(15)(d) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Pradeep Kumar Lalit Kumar Pandya challenging the concurrent judgments of the Small Causes Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Bonafide Requirement of Landlord Upheld. Tenant's Claim of Availability of Alternate Premises Rejected as Landlord Cannot Be Compelled to Use Residential Premises for Commercial Purpose Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the defendant-tenant (Parshuram Chunilal Kanojiya) challenging the eviction decree passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Setting Aside Appellate Authority Order Under Madhya Pradesh Shops & Establishments Act, 1958. The Court affirmed that clubs not being residential clubs are exempt from the Act under Section 3(j), rendering the Appellate Authority's reinstatement order invalid.

The dispute arose from the termination of services of the appellants, who were employees at a club run by the respondents. The appellants filed a comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Satyawati Sharma to Larger Bench in Delhi Rent Control Eviction Case — Landlord's Bonafide Need for Non-Residential Premises Under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

The Supreme Court was hearing a batch of appeals arising from eviction petitions filed by landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit — Landlord Failed to Prove Bona Fide Need for Residential Premises Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenant's Use of Rear Rooms for Storage and Occasional Stay Did Not Constitute Subletting or Change of User.

The petitioner, a tenant, challenged the judgment and order dated 11th August 1999 passed by the Additional District Judge, Thane, which partly decree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Change of User from Residential to Commercial. Tenant's Use of Premises for Storing Cloth Packages and Business Constitutes Change of User Under Rent Control Legislation.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendants (tenants) challenging the judgment and decree of the lower Appellate C...