Search Results for "Order XXXVII CPC"

68 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 68 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Summary Suit for Recovery of Money — Defendant Granted Leave to Defend as Triable Issues Exist. The court set aside the decree and remanded the matter for trial, holding that the trial court erred in not granting leave to defend under Order 37 Rule 3(6)(a) CPC.

This appeal by the defendant is directed against the judgment and decree dated January 25, 2010 in O.S. No. 15450/2005 passed by the XXVI Addl. City C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Summary Suit Case — Sets Aside Leave to Defend Granted to Defendant Due to Lack of Triable Issues. The court held that unconditional leave to defend cannot be granted unless the defendant raises triable issues under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC.

The petitioner, Metro Cash & Carry India Pvt. Ltd., filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Summary Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC Due to Absence of Triable Issues. Leave to Defend Rightly Denied as Invoices Constituted Written Contracts Establishing Appellant's Liability for Goods Supplied.

The appeal arose from a summary suit for money recovery filed under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the plaintiff-respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit — Defendant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. Order XXXVII Rule 4 CPC Requires Strict Compliance with Conditions for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree.

The appellant, Purnendu Shekharmal Jain, was the original defendant in Summary Suit No. 2539 of 2012 filed by M/s ACG Associated Capsules P Ltd. An ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit Due to Non-Service of Summons for Judgment on Defendants' Advocate. Service on Defendants directly without prior attempt on advocate held insufficient under Order XXXVII CPC.

The petitioners, original defendants in Summary Suit No.4914 of 2012, challenged the order dated 08.07.2013 passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Decree in Summary Suit Due to Lack of Proper Service of Summons. Delay of 164 Days Condoned as Defendant Demonstrated Good Cause for Non-Appearance Under Order XXXVII of CPC, 1908.

The plaintiff, Fountainhead Promotions & Events Pvt Ltd, filed a Summary Suit No. 874 of 2010 against the defendant, Gitanjali Lifestyle Limited, clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Magnetite Powder Price. The court held that triable issues existed but the defendant's defence was not wholly bona fide, warranting security under Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 38,89,674.14 filed by the plaintiff (M/s. Parijat Enterprises...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Summary Suit Due to Defective Summons — Form 4 Instead of Form 4-A Under Order XXXVII CPC Renders Service Invalid. The court held that the summons must strictly comply with the prescribed form and failure to do so vitiates the service and the consequent decree.

The appellant, Ramesh Shende, was the defendant in a summary suit filed by the respondent, Narayan Wakodikar, under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil ...