Search Results for "Order XXII"

383 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 383 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Partition Suit -- Trial Court's Discretion Under CPC Upheld Despite 20-Year Delay in Filing

The petitioner challenged the Trial Court's order rejecting her application to implead family members as defendants in a partition suit pending since ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Permission to File Written Statement Beyond Limitation in Specific Performance Suit. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory; Legal Representatives of Deceased Defendant Allowed to File Written Statement as No Prejudice Caused to Plaintiff.

The petitioner, Subhash Dhanraj Sankla, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a property owned by Rhoda Phiroze Noble. The ori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Adoption Dispute Due to Abatement — Conflict of Decrees Would Arise if Appeal Proceeded. Right to Sue Did Not Survive to Surviving Appellant Alone; Appeal Abated as a Whole Under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal arising from a suit challenging the validity of an adoption. The appellants, two brothers, had filed a suit seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal Against Abatement of Appeal Due to Procedural Lapses - Condonation of Delay Application Not Required for Setting Aside Abatement Under Order XXII Rule 9 CPC

The appellants, original plaintiffs in a suit for cancellation of sale deed and permanent injunction, filed Regular Civil Appeal No.160 of 2010 agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for specific performance of an agr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Satara, which c...