Search Results for "Monthly tenancy"

381 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 381 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Suit — Confirms Findings of Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Upheld as Tenants Failed to Prove Bona Fide Use and Consent for Subletting.

The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning Shop No.2 and rear portion of Shop No.1 in Supariwala Mansion, Parel, Mumbai. The original p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Eviction Suit Against MSEB in Rent Control Dispute — State Government Not the Tenant. The court held that MSEB was the tenant and the suit was maintainable, setting aside the concurrent decrees of the lower courts.

The petitioner, The Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (HSBC), filed a writ petition challenging the concurrent judgments of the Small C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.

The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Trespass Suit — Jurisdiction Must Be Decided on Plaint Averments, Not Evidence. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC, a plaint can be returned only if the plaint itself shows lack of jurisdiction, not after a trial on evidence.

The appellant, Globe Theatres Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court for recovery of possession, injunction, and damages against the r...