Search Results for "Mandatory Injunction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Mandatory Injunction"

909 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 909 result(s)

High Court

High Court Upholds Appellate Court's Grant of Temporary Injunction in Easement Dispute Based on Sale Deed Recital. The court affirmed the plaintiff's entitlement to an approach way as an easement by grant under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, due to a prima facie case and balance of convenience favoring injunction.

6 Apr 2026

The dispute involved a writ petition filed by the original defendant challenging the Appellate Court's judgment that allowed an appeal and granted tem...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Title and Possession. Plaintiff's Title Based on Registered Sale Deed and Long-Standing Possession Prevails Over Defendant's Claim of Adverse Possession.

10 Feb 2026

The case involves a property dispute between the plaintiff, N. Natarajan, and the defendants, A. David (appellant) and A. Dennis. The plaintiff filed ...

Supreme Court

“Mandatory Injunction vs Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 41(h) Specific Relief Act (2026 INSC 61)”“Cloud on Title & Possession: Why Injunction Suit Fails

15 Jan 2026

In Sanjay Paliwal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., the plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to remove a wall allegedly blocking access to their l...

High Court

Injunction Suit Not Maintainable When Title Is Disputed

14 Jan 2026

The High Court of Karnataka held that when title to immovable property is disputed, a suit for mere permanent or mandatory injunction is not maintaina...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Ex Parte Temporary Injunction in Membership Dispute — Trial Court Failed to Record Satisfaction of Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Injury Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. The Court Remanded the Matter for Fresh Hearing After Finding That the Trial Court Did Not Comply With Order 39 Rule 3 CPC Requiring Reasons for Dispensing With Notice.

20 Dec 2024

The appellant, Bowring Institute, challenged an order dated 22.11.2024 passed by the 41st Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Internal Dispute — Interim Injunction Denied for Party Meetings. Court holds that temporary injunction in political party affairs requires strict compliance with CPC principles and balance of convenience.

27 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from interim orders in civil suits concerning the internal management of the All India Anna D...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Returning Plaint for Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction in Suit for Injunction and Damages. The Court Held That for Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Only Plaint Averments Are Relevant, Not Evidence.

5 Aug 2022

The appellant, Bharat Bhushan Gupta, filed a suit for mandatory and prohibitory injunction and recovery of damages against the respondents, Pratap Nar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Oral Evidence in Temporary Injunction Proceedings Under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC. The Court has inherent jurisdiction to permit oral evidence for just and effective adjudication of interim injunction applications.

27 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Babulal Onkardas Kabra, was the original defendant in a suit filed by the respondents, Nilesh, Shailesh, and Rakesh Pukhraj Rathod, in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Holds That Bar Under Section 47 CPC Does Not Apply to Persons Not Bound by Previous Decree. The Court ruled that the lower appellate court erred in applying the bar of Section 47 read with Order XXI Rule 101 CPC to a suit filed by persons who were not parties to the earlier decree.

11 Mar 2016

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the appellant (original defendant) against the judg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.

5 Nov 2014

The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)