Search Results for "Malicious Prosecution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Malicious Prosecution"

196 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Malicious Prosecution Suit — Acquittal in Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Does Not Automatically Furnish Cause of Action for Malicious Prosecution. The court held that a suit for malicious prosecution based solely on acquittal in proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, without allegations of malice and lack of reasonable cause, is not maintainable and the plaint is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

2 Jul 2026

The applicant, Abhijeet B. Chavan, filed a Civil Revision Application before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 2nd January 2024 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Malicious Prosecution Suit — Acquittal in Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Does Not Automatically Furnish Cause of Action for Malicious Prosecution. The court held that the mere fact of acquittal in proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, does not, by itself, give rise to a cause of action for a suit for malicious prosecution, and the plaint is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

2 Jul 2026

The applicant, Mr. Abhijeet B. Chavan, filed a Civil Revision Application before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging an orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Malicious Prosecution Suit — Acquittal in Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Does Not Automatically Furnish Cause of Action for Malicious Prosecution. The court held that a suit for malicious prosecution based solely on acquittal in cheque dishonour proceedings is not maintainable when the cheque was admittedly issued by the plaintiff.

2 Jul 2026

The applicant (defendant in the original suit) filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 CPC challenging the order of the Trial Court dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against TV Show Participants in Religious Sentiment Case. Alleged Offence Under Section 295-A IPC Not Made Out as Acts Did Not Deliberately and Maliciously Intend to Outrage Religious Feelings.

29 Apr 2026

The Bombay High Court disposed of two criminal writ petitions challenging the registration of FIR No. 265 of 2010 under Section 295-A read with Sectio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging ICC Report Omission in POSH Act Case — Petitioner's Grievance Limited to Non-Naming of Alleged Instigator, Not Maintainable Under Article 226. The court held that the ICC's omission to name the alleged instigator did not cause prejudice and that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of seeking disciplinary action.

20 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Shrinivas Shinde, a Lower Division Clerk employed with the Directorate of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship (Respondent No. 1), fil...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Under Section 295A IPC and Section 67 IT Act in WhatsApp Group Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Insufficient Evidence -- Petitioner Acquitted of Religious Offence Charges

30 Jan 2026

The Karnataka High Court allowed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash an FIR registered under Section 295A IPC and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Charge-Sheet for Lack of Sanction Under Section 196 CrPC in Religious Outrage Case — WhatsApp Chats Not Deliberate or Malicious Under Section 295A IPC. The court held that prior sanction is mandatory for prosecution under Section 295A IPC and the alleged chats did not constitute deliberate and malicious intent to outrage religious feelings.

24 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) heard two applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) filed by Dr. Subhash and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalists in Sedition Case for Reporting on Alleged Corruption. Reporting of public interest matters does not constitute sedition under Section 124A IPC unless there is incitement to violence or public disorder.

9 Apr 2021

The case involves nine criminal writ petitions filed by journalists and media persons (Sudheer Rikhari, Nikhil Vasudevan, Subhanshu Singh, Sumant Bala...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against YouTuber for Disparaging Marico's Products in Video Review. Court holds that false and malicious statements in product reviews can constitute disparagement, and interim injunction can be granted even if defendant is not a competitor.

15 Jan 2020

The plaintiff, Marico Limited, a company manufacturing and selling various consumer products including hair oils and foods, filed a suit against the d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Malicious Prosecution — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Malice and Absence of Reasonable and Probable Cause. The court held that the plaintiff must establish both malice and lack of reasonable and probable cause for the prosecution, and that the acquittal in the criminal case does not automatically entitle the plaintiff to damages.

27 Apr 2005

The plaintiff, Shyam Sunder Bubna, filed a suit for malicious prosecution against M/s. Savani Transport Private Limited and its branch manager, Akhtar...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)