Search Results for "Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2005"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2005"

307 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 307 result(s)

High Court

Writ Petition Before Bombay High Court Challenging Interest Imposed Under Section 30(4) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 for Pre-Amendment Periods. Dispute Concerned Whether Dealer Liable for Interest for Years 2005-06 to 2007-08 Under Provision Effective from 1 July 2009.

29 Mar 2012

The petitioners, M/s. Taurus Auto Dealers Pvt. Ltd. and its director, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

10 Jun 2013

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

High Court

High Court of Bombay hears writ petition challenging constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 on input tax credit set-off — Petitioner seeks reading down of 'actually paid' to 'ought to have been paid'

11 May 2012

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a partnership firm registered as a dealer under the Maharashtra Value Ad...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.4520 OF 2014

30 Apr 2015

The writ petitions challenged the constitutional validity and propriety of a notification dated January 29, 2014, issued by the Finance Department of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits MVAT Appeal on Questions of Law Regarding Package Scheme of Incentives and Retrospective Amendment. Appeal Challenges Pro-Rata Exemption Applied Under Amended Section 93 of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, Asserting Full Exemption After Exhaustion of Benefits Before Amendment.

29 Oct 2018

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Bunker Fuel Sales to Vessels on High Seas Are Taxable Under Maharashtra VAT Act. Petitioners Challenged Assessment Orders and Recovery Notices Claiming Sales Occurred Outside State Territory and Were in Course of Export.

19 Oct 2015

The dispute arose from assessment and recovery proceedings under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 concerning sales of High Speed Diesel (HSD)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Section 55 of MVAT (Levy and Amendment) Act, 2005 — Purchase Tax on Sugarcane Upheld. Repeal Provision Deleted Before MVAT Act Came Into Force, So Sugarcane Purchase Tax Act Continues.

8 Sep 2011

The petitioner, M/s Vithal Sugar Manufacturing Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Upon Challenge to Pre-Deposit Order and Validity of Explanation to Schedule Entry A-45 of MVAT Act, 2002. The Petition Seeks Quashing of Assessment and Pre-Deposit Orders for Pan Masala Containing Tobacco Exemption Denial and Striking Down of Discriminatory Notification.

4 Oct 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of pan masala with and without tobacco, challenged the levy of VAT on pan masala contai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in MVAT Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Natural Justice. Inter-State Stock Transfer Not a Sale Under MVAT Act, 2002; Reassessment Beyond 4-Year Limitation Period Invalid.

29 Apr 2022

The petitioner, M/s. United Spirits Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages, filed a writ petition challenging a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in VAT Classification of Electric Bicycle — EBikeMatrix Held to Be a Bicycle Under Schedule Entry C14 of MVAT Act, 2002. The court held that a bicycle with an auxiliary electric motor of less than 0.5 KW and battery backup is a 'bicycle' under Entry C14, taxable at 4%, not 12.5%.

6 May 2010

The appellant, M/s R.K. Rim Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of bicycles, started producing a product called 'EBikeMatrix', which is a bicycle with an auxili...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)