Search Results for "Law Officers Rules 1984"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Law Officers Rules 1984"

731 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 731 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Hears Challenge by Additional Government Pleaders and Public Prosecutors Against Termination Clause in Fresh Appointment Advertisement. Court Examines Whether Clause 7 of 13.03.2015 Advertisement Amounts to Illegal Termination in Violation of Maharashtra Law Officers (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 1984, and Article 14 of Constitution of India.

5 May 2015

The petitioners, functioning as Additional Government Pleaders, Assistant Government Pleaders, and Additional Public Prosecutors in the High Court of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Police Personnel Challenging Refusal to Permit Formation of Association, Holding Restriction Valid Under Article 33(b) and Police Forces (Restriction of Rights) Act, 1966. Denial of Permission Not Violative of Article 19(1)(c) as Prior Sanction Requirement Fulfills Constitutional Safeguards and Alternative Grievance Mechanisms Exist.

16 Sep 2016

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 filed by five police personnel from various lower ranks (Police Sub Inspector, Police Naik, Assist...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Police Officer in 1984 Anti-Sikh Riots Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Procedural Unfairness. The Court held that remand to Disciplinary Authority for fresh disagreement note was unjustified given 38-year delay, appellant's retirement at age 80, and violation of natural justice in earlier proceedings under service rules.

23 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from disciplinary proceedings against a police officer related to the 1984 Anti-Sikh Riots. The appellant, posted as Inspector of Pol...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of District Government Pleader and Public Prosecutor for Dhule Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Rules. Appointment of Respondent No.3 Set Aside as Government Failed to Follow Procedure Under Maharashtra Law Officers (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Remuneration) Rules, 2014.

6 Jun 2017

The petitioner, Dilip Gangaram Patil, an advocate, filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of Respondent No.3, Sunil Popatlal Jain, as Distr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Considers Validity of Rule Excluding Full-Time Salaried Assistant Public Prosecutors from District Judge Appointments. The case concerns interpretation of 'advocate' under Article 233(2) of the Constitution and consistency with Supreme Court precedent.

17 Oct 2012

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court heard a reference arising from a writ petition filed by six Assistant Public Prosecutors employed on a full-ti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Retired Livestock Development Officers Seeking Equal Pay with Graduate Counterparts. Diploma-holder LDOs not entitled to higher pay scale granted to graduates under 1999 notification as distinction based on educational qualification is valid.

29 Oct 2015

The petitioners, nine retired Livestock Development Officers (LDOs) holding diplomas, filed a writ petition seeking the same higher pay scale as gradu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Police Sub-Inspector Challenging Compulsory Retirement Order. Departmental Enquiry Based on Misconduct Involving Smuggled Goods Upheld as Fair and Proper.

12 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Hisamuddin Abdul Rahim Kazi, a Sub-Inspector of Police in Maharashtra, joined service on 1st March 1967. On 4th June 1987, the Commiss...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

1 Jan 1970

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Under Uttar Pradesh Police Radio Service Rules, 1979. The Court upheld the High Court's decision sustaining the seniority list, emphasizing strict compliance with service rules for seniority determination and proper handling of vacancies due to superannuation or death.

16 Jan 2023

The appeal concerned the legality of a seniority list dated 25th October 2013 for Assistant Radio Officers in the Uttar Pradesh Police Radio Departmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Special Public Prosecutor Appointments; Appointments Made at Instance of Complainants Challenged as Violative of Mukul Dalal Guidelines and CrPC.

26 Apr 2005

The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions challenging the appointments of Special Public Prosecutors under Section 24(8) of the Code of Criminal ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)