Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Disputes arose from Construction Management Agreements regarding completion notices and fee obligations, with the court determining arbitration under those agreements was appropriate.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with two arbitration petitions filed by DLF Home Developers Limited (DHDL) under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Government of Israel in Commercial Lease Dispute. Arbitrator's Rejection of Set-Off and Counter-Claim as Time-Barred Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

The petitioner, Earnest Business Services Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Commercial Arbitration Application Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Clause 32 of Work Order Held to Contain Valid Arbitration Agreement Despite Ambiguous Wording.

The applicant, M/s. Jay Bhagwati Construction Co., a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Revocation of Leave Under Clause XII of Letters Patent Act in Arbitration Petition. Court Holds That Cause of Action for Section 9 Petition Arises Where Arbitration Agreement Is Situated, Not Where Interim Relief Is Sought.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who allowed Chamber Summons No. 905 of 2013 filed by Respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration. Parties Impliedly Excluded Part I of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Agreeing to ICC Rules and Zambian Law.

The petitioner, Konkola Copper Mines (PLC), a company registered in Zambia, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...