Search Results for "Indian Telegraph Act, 1885"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Indian Telegraph Act, 1885"

55 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Against BWSSB for Unauthorised Laying of Sewer Pipelines in Private Lands Without Acquisition. Petitioners Challenge Section 77 as Unconstitutional and Seek Compensation for Violation of Right to Property Under Article 300A.

1 Jun 2026

...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Notification and Order for Removal of Obstructions — Violation of Natural Justice. Order Under Section 16(1) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 Quashed as Petitioners Were Not Heard.

19 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Dalwadi Pramodkumar Dayarambhai and others, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging a notification published ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Interception Orders in CBI Corruption Case for Lack of Reasons and Public Emergency. Orders under Section 5(2) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 set aside as they merely recited statutory language without recording cogent reasons demonstrating public safety or public emergency.

6 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Shyamalendu Kumar Das, a Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), challenged two orders dated 9 March 2018 and 17 March 2018 passed...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Injunction in Electricity Transmission Line Dispute — Balance of Convenience Favours Completion of Line Subject to Compensation. The Court held that where the District Magistrate has granted permission under Section 16(1) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 and 80% of the work is complete, the balance of convenience does not justify an interim injunction.

9 Jan 2019

The first respondent, IVP Limited, owned non-agricultural land in villages Vadavali and Mohane. It filed a suit for permanent injunction alleging that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Injunction in Electricity Act Dispute — LILO Scheme Not a 'Works' Under Section 164. Court holds that LILO scheme does not constitute 'laying of electric lines' under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003, and that the District Judge correctly upheld the injunction against the petitioner.

9 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Century Rayon Limited, challenged an order dated 28 June 2018 passed by the learned District Judge-4, Kalyan, dismissing its Miscellan...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Compensation Determination Under Indian Telegraph Act for Land Diminution Due to Transmission Tower Erection. District Court's Award of Compensation for Diminution in Land Value Upheld in Revision Petitions Under Section 115 of CPC.

30 Sep 2015

The matter arose from a batch of miscellaneous petitions filed by landowners under Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, seeking compensati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transmission Line Over Private Land, Upholds Validity of Section 164 of Electricity Act, 2003. The Court Held That the Provisions for Laying Electricity Lines Without Prior Consent Are Constitutional as They Provide for Hearing and Compensation.

3 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Jarnail Singh and Surinder Singh, are owners of land in Nagpur over which respondent No.1, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Tower Construction on Agricultural Land Without Consent. Landowners' Rights Under Article 300A of the Constitution Upheld Against State's Unilateral Action.

4 Sep 2012

The petitioners, Kishor s/o Ravindra Zope, Pradip s/o Ravindra Zope, and Pushpabai (Punyabai) w/o Ravindra Zope, are agriculturists residing in Warang...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging District Magistrate's Jurisdiction Under Indian Telegraph Act — NTPC Not a 'Telegraph Authority'. The court held that only a 'Telegraph Authority' as defined under Section 3(6) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 can invoke Section 16(1), and NTPC Ltd., not being a notified authority, cannot maintain such an application.

23 Feb 2012

The petitioners, nine agriculturists and owners of land in village Mouda, District Nagpur, challenged an order dated 30.01.2012 passed by the District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowner's Compensation Claim Under Indian Telegraph Act for Tree Removal by Electricity Board - Maintainability of Application Under Section 16(3) Upheld. The court held that Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 applies to electricity boards for compensation for tree removal, and the District Judge has jurisdiction to decide such application.

8 Dec 2005

The case involves two writ petitions. The first writ petition was filed by Sau. Kalpana Rukhabdas Jain, a landowner, challenging the order dated 25.1....

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)