Search Results for "IPC 392"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "IPC 392"

225 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 225 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeals in Kidnapping and Attempted Murder Case by Setting Aside Conviction Under Section 364A IPC. Conviction for Attempt to Murder and Robbery Upheld as Prosecution Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt the Strangulation, Burning, and Looting of Victim, But Failed to Establish Ransom Demand Essential for Section 364A Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3 Jan 2024

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur dated 26.06.2018, which dismissed the criminal appeals of the a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape and Robbery Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Evidence of Victim and Witnesses Found Unreliable, Medical and Forensic Evidence Not Supporting Prosecution Case.

31 Oct 2022

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment of acquittal dated 18...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Robbery Case — Conviction Under Section 397 IPC Set Aside as Firearm Not Actually Used. Robbery Under Section 392 IPC Upheld Based on Credible Testimony and Recovery of Stolen Property.

28 Mar 2022

The appellant, Ram Ratan, was convicted by the Special Judge under the MPDVPK Act, 1981, Sheopur, for offences under Sections 392 and 397 of the India...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Non-Applicability of Section 397 IPC. The Court held that Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, applies only to the offender who uses a deadly weapon, and the benefit of acquittal of a co-accused extends to other accused when allegations are indivisible, leading to acquittal based on unreliable identification and suspicious FIR.

29 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by two appellants, Ganesan and Shanmugam, challenging their conviction under Section 397 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Leave for Life Convict — Adverse Police Report Based on Expired Sentence Not Valid. Petitioner's Sentence Under Section 392 IPC Already Served, Hence Cannot Be Ground for Rejection.

26 Jun 2018

The petitioner, a life convict convicted under Sections 302 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code, had undergone approximately 17 years of imprisonment. He...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 394 read with 34 IPC set aside as sole testimony of child witness was not corroborated and identification parade was not conducted properly.

23 Feb 2018

The case pertains to a criminal appeal against the conviction of the appellant-accused for offences under Sections 302, 392, 394 read with 34 of the I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Motor Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash Driving. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act as No Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving Was Adduced.

15 Feb 2017

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 16 April 19...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 392, 506 IPC and Sections 25(1A), 27(1) Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and no public witness was examined.

21 Aug 2015

The appellant, Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir in Sessions Case No. 06/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction in Robbery Case: Section 397 IPC Not Attracted as No Individual Use of Deadly Weapon Proved. Appellant's Conviction Under Section 392 IPC Sustained but Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone.

14 Oct 2011

The appeal was filed by original accused Nos. 1 and 2 against their conviction under Section 392 read with Section 397 read with Section 34 of the Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused No.2 in Robbery Case with Deadly Weapon. Use of Sword-Like Weapon During Robbery Attracts Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 IPC.

11 Jun 2010

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Ganesh @ Ganya Karunamurti, accused No.2, challenging his conviction and sentence by the tr...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)