Search Results for "High Court Primacy"

345 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 345 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Addresses Challenge to National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) Notifications for Medical Admissions. The court examines the regulatory power of medical councils and the impact on minority educational institutions under Articles 19(1)(g) and 30 of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of writ petitions and transferred cases challenging four notifications issued by the Medical Council of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers PIL on Infrastructure of Judiciary; Examines Primacy of High Court's Recommendations for Additional Courts. Court Notes State Government's Delays and Insistence That Its Own Views Prevail, Highlighting Need for 867 Additional Courts and Special Courts for Vulnerable Groups.

This public interest litigation was instituted by a chartered accountant, Vihar Durve, raising concerns about the infrastructure of the judiciary in t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Public Prosecutor for Pune District Due to Non-Compliance with Section 24 CrPC. Appointment made without consulting the Advocate General and without considering eligible Additional Public Prosecutors violates statutory requirements.

The petitioner, Mrs. Neelima Sadanand Vartak, an Additional Public Prosecutor in Pune District since 1986, challenged the notification dated 1st June ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...