Search Results for "Gainful Employment"

181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal of Conductor Denied Back Wages After Reinstatement — Held That Denial of Full Back Wages Was Justified Due to Failure to Prove Unemployment, But Directed Payment of 50% Back Wages Considering Long Litigation and Reinstatement.

The appellant, Ramesh Chand, was employed as a conductor with the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) on 22 June 1985. On 8 September 1992, he was serve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Workman in Absenteeism and Assault Case, Reduces Backwages to 25%. Industrial Court's reduction of backwages from 50% to 25% upheld as workman failed to prove he was not gainfully employed during dismissal period.

The petitioner, Sahebrao Khemaji Kale, a workman employed as a Painter and later Moulder with Paras Agro Engineering Work, was dismissed from service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition of Ex-Conductor Challenging Labour Court Award Denying Reinstatement. Labour Court's Finding of Invalid Enquiry Did Not Automatically Entitle Workman to Reinstatement; No Back Wages Awarded Due to Lack of Proof of Unemployment.

The petitioner, Dasharath, was a conductor employed by the NEKRTC (respondent). He was charged with misconduct of pilferage and, after a departmental ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Workmen's Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Back Wages in Illegal Retrenchment Case. Court Holds That Retrenchment Without Compliance With Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act Is Void and Workmen Entitled to Reinstatement With Full Back Wages.

The judgment arises from two writ petitions and a civil application concerning the termination of workmen employed by the Government of Maharashtra. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Workman's Petition for Full Backwages in Illegal Termination Case. Employer Failed to Prove Gainful Employment for Entire Period, but Workman's Admissions Limited Backwages to Period of Unemployment.

The petitioner, Burhanuddin Sayyed Ali, was employed as a Turner with Rank Controls & Instruments (Pvt.) Ltd. from 5 February 1984. On 14 March 1986, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 17-B Application for Six Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Employer Must Pay Full Wages Pending Writ. Workmen's Affidavits of Unemployment Sufficient; No Need to Plead Not Gainfully Employed in Original Affidavit.

The case involves a Civil Application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, filed by Kirloskar Pneumatic Kamgar Sangh (the Union) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows Employer's Petition in Driver Termination Case. Reinstatement Upheld but Backwages Reduced from 50% to 30% Due to Gainful Employment Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, ITM Vocational University, challenged the judgment and award dated 01.08.2023 passed by the Labour Court, Vadodara in Reference (LCV) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Partially Allows Writ Petition by Irrigation Department Officers Against Tribunal's Order of Full Back Wages. Back Wages Set Aside for Lack of Enquiry into Gainful Employment; Liberty Granted for Fresh Enquiry into Misconduct.

The petitioners, officers of the Irrigation Department of Maharashtra, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 8.8.2005....