Search Results for "Exclusive Expenditure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Exclusive Expenditure"

367 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 367 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Section 44C Interpretation Matter, Upholds Assessee's Claim for Full Deduction of Exclusive Expenses. Exclusive Expenditure Incurred by Head Office Solely for Indian Branches Not Governed by Section 44C Limitation, Fully Allowable Under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Disallowance of Expenditure on Technical Know-How and Interest on Delayed Payment of Sales Tax. Expenditure on Technical Know-How Held to Be Revenue in Nature and Interest on Delayed Payment of Sales Tax Held to Be Allowable Deduction Under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

17 Apr 2015

The appeal was filed by the assessee, M/s. Diffusion Engineers Ltd., challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for the assessm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case — Advertisement Expenses Not Subject to Disallowance. Assessee's expenditure on promoting foreign channels held to be for its own business benefit, not requiring compensation from foreign principals.

13 Oct 2014

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 29th July 2011, which confi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Claim for Weighted Deduction Under Section 35B of Income Tax Act — Subcontractor Not Entitled to Export Markets Development Allowance for Services Rendered to Indian Main Contractor. The court held that the assessee, as a subcontractor to an Indian company, did not incur expenditure for its own export business and thus could not claim weighted deduction under Section 35B.

13 Oct 2016

The case involves an income tax reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the assessment year 1979-80. The assessee, Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Payment to Retiring Partners Held Capital Expenditure. Amount of Rs.1,34,678 paid to retiring partners under Memorandum of Understanding is capital expenditure not deductible as revenue expenditure.

30 Aug 2005

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessee, Mandovi Hotel Pvt....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Technical Know-how Fees and Duty Free Advance Licence Issues. Technical know-how fees paid under non-exclusive licence for limited period held revenue expenditure; Duty Free Advance Licence not real income under Section 28(iv) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

22 Mar 2010

The appeal by the Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding assessment year 1999-2000. The assessee, M/s Essel Propa...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Refers Question of Law on Allowability of Expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) and Section 172 of Income Tax Act to Larger Bench. Disagreement with earlier Division Bench decision in CIT v. Orient (Goa) Pvt. Ltd. leads to referral on whether payer's non-resident status required for invoking proviso to Section 172.

5 Feb 2016

Background: The case concerns income tax appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal, Holding Royalty Payment for Mining Lease is Revenue Expenditure. Yearly royalty of Rs. 96,000 under mining arrangement with Government deductible under Income-tax Act as it relates to raw material obtained, not capital outlay.

15 Nov 1965

This appeal arose from income tax assessment proceedings for the years 1954-55 to 1956-57. The appellant, a registered firm manufacturing lime from li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Tax Case, Upholds ITAT Order Treating Contribution for Bridge Construction as Revenue Expenditure. Contribution of ₹1,38,54,167 by Mining Company to Government Undertaking for Bridge Construction Held to be Revenue Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961, as It Was for Smooth Running of Business and Not for Acquisition of Capital Asset.

9 Jul 2019

The case involves a tax appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Panaji Bench, which he...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Assessee in Income Tax Case — Write-off of Advances and Expenses Held Allowable as Business Loss Under Section 28 of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that amounts advanced to a business associate in the course of business dealings and written off as irrecoverable are deductible as business loss.

9 Jun 2023

The appellant, Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., a public limited company engaged in manufacturing and trading, filed an appeal under Section 206A of the In...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)