Search Results for "Descriptive abbreviation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Descriptive abbreviation"

16 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Vacation of Interim Injunction in 'RACIRAFT' vs 'ESIRAFT' Trademark Case. The Court Examines Whether the Impugned Mark 'ESIRAFT' is Deceptively Similar to the Registered Mark 'RACIRAFT' for Pharmaceutical Products, Applying the Anti-Dissection Rule and Principles of Phonetic and Visual Similarity.

8 Apr 2026

The case involved a commercial appeal filed by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. against an order of the Single Judge vacating an ad-interim injuncti...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trade Mark Registrations for 'WHISPER' and 'ALWAYS' Marks — Petitioner's Prior Use and Well-Known Status Established, Respondent's Registration Cancelled.

6 Jan 2026

The petitioner, The Procter & Gamble Company, a multinational corporation, filed three original petitions under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction Applications in Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over 'NFC' Element. Court Holds that Abbreviation 'NFC' for Natural Fibre Composite is Descriptive and Not Entitled to Interim Protection Without Evidence of Secondary Meaning Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

26 Feb 2025

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed before the Madras High Court by two plaintiffs: an individual, B.L. Bengani, and his company, Indowud N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Use of 'RPG' Mark by Defendants in Passing Off and Trade Mark Infringement Suit. The court held that the Defendants' use of 'RPG' as a prominent feature in their trade name was deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's registered marks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and likely to cause confusion.

21 Mar 2022

The Plaintiff, RPG Enterprises Limited, a multi-industry Indian conglomerate, filed a suit against the Defendants, Riju Ghoshal and Poulami Ghoshal, f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and phonetically similar, and the Defendant's use is likely to cause confusion, especially in medicinal products where a high degree of care is expected.

2 Jul 2019

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, Swisskem Healthcare and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — Registered Proprietor's Rights Protected Against Deceptively Similar Marks. The court affirmed the trial court's order granting interim injunction restraining the defendant from using marks deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark 'Prem Mehandi Centre' under Sections 28, 29, 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

19 Oct 2016

The respondent/plaintiff, proprietor of 'Prem Mehandi Centre', filed two suits (Suit No. 1 of 2015 and Suit No. 2 of 2015) against the appellants/defe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

21 Jan 2014

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for ANTITHYROX and THYROX Against Defendant's LETHYROX. No deceptive similarity found as prefix 'LE' distinguishes marks and THYROX is descriptive of thyroid treatment.

29 May 2013

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a suit against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another for infringement of their registered trad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off in Pharmaceutical Product 'ONCO BCG' - Defendant's Mark 'BCG ONCO' Held Deceptively Similar Despite Common Descriptive Element 'BCG'.

14 Jun 2011

The plaintiff, Serum Institute of India Limited, a pharmaceutical company, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against Green Sign...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)