Search Results for "Departmental Examination"

744 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 744 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable for Dual Appointment and Forgery in Jharkhand Police Case. Division Bench Erred in Reappreciating Evidence in Departmental Enquiry Where Charges of Fraud and Unauthorised Absence Were Proved on Preponderance of Probabilities.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi, which allowed the Letters Patent Appeal file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Order Declining Approval Under Prevention of Corruption Act Due to Non-Application of Mind. The Court held that an order under Section 17A must reflect independent consideration and cannot be based solely on exoneration in a departmental enquiry, directing fresh reconsideration.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a lawyer and social activist challenging an order dated 26-05-2025 passed by the Under Secretary, Depa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to MPSC's Refusal to Recommend Candidates for Teacher Posts Due to Age Bar — MPSC's Discretion to Prescribe Age Limit Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The State of Maharashtra and its education authorities filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion Policy Based on Merit-Cum-Seniority in High Court Administration. Court upholds that marks in departmental examination are not the sole criterion for promotion and that seniority can be given weightage under the applicable rules.

The petitioner, Kishore D. Raorane, joined the High Court administration on the Original Side as a Clerk in 1985 and retired as Master (Adm) in 2021. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates Dismissal Order in CRPF Disciplinary Proceedings Due to High Court's Excessive Judicial Review. Judicial Review Limited to Procedural Fairness, Not Merits or Evidence Re-evaluation, Under Section 11(1) of CRPF Act, 1949 and Rule 27 of CRPF Rules, 1955.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a General Duty Constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) following departmental proceedings. The co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Second Departmental Enquiry Against RPF ASI for Same Misconduct — Double Jeopardy Principle Under Article 20(2) of Constitution and Rule 219.4(b) of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 Bars Re-prosecution After Final Punishment

The petitioner, Ramrao Maroti Shinde, an Assistant Sub-Inspector in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), was subjected to a departmental enquiry in May...