Search Results for "Catering Policy 2017"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Revenue Appeals Against Single Judge's Order Quashing Service Tax Demand, Arguing University's Activities Are Commercial and Taxable. Court Examines Educational Institution Exemption Under Finance Act, 1994.

This intra-court appeal arose from a Single Judge's order quashing a show cause notice and demand for service tax issued to Rajiv Gandhi University of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Pronounced Order on Writ Petitions Challenging Railway Catering Policy Addendum. Petitioners Contended That Addendum Required Cabinet Approval, While Respondents Defended It as Within Competence and for Hygiene Improvement.

The South Western Railway Catering Contractors Association, a registered body of railway catering contractors, filed two writ petitions under Articles...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...