Search Results for "CIPLA"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "CIPLA"

95 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 95 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Petitioner's Trade Mark for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirement Under Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Removal of Trade Mark 'CIPLA' Held Void as Registrar Failed to Send O-3 Notice to Registered Proprietor, Contravening Statutory Mandate.

23 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Cipla Limited, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the removal of its registered trade mark 'CIPLA' from the register and a mandamus ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Passing Off Action — Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Khandelwal Laboratories Ltd. — Trade Mark CEFO v. CEFI. The court found that the marks CEFO and CEFI are deceptively similar, especially in the pharmaceutical context, and granted temporary injunction under Section 27 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

27 Sep 2005

The plaintiff, Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for passing off against Khandelwal Laboratories Ltd. seeking interim injunction to restrain t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

20 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case Involving Pharmaceutical Marks LOX and XYLOX. Court finds prima facie that Defendants' XYLOX marks are deceptively similar to Plaintiff's LOX family of marks, and that the defence of common origin or acquiescence is not made out.

16 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Neon Laboratories Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Themis Medicare Ltd. (Defendant No. 1) and Ciro...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Prima Facie Upholds Plaintiff’s Patent and Finds Infringement by Defendant in Transformer Explosion Prevention Technology Case; Interim Injunction Issued. Court Rejects Defendant’s Arguments on Invalidity and Defences, Holding That a Strong Prima Facie Case Exists Under the Patents Act, 1970.

23 Oct 2015

The dispute involved a claim of patent infringement concerning a system and method for preventing and detecting explosion and fire in electrical trans...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against IPAB Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Patent Pre-Grant Opposition. Pre-grant opponent not heard before allowing patent appeal, order set aside and matter remanded.

5 Nov 2020

The petitioner, Dhaval Diyora, filed a pre-grant opposition under Section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 against the patent application of Respondent ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.

20 Aug 2024

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order in Leave and License Dispute — Interim Relief Granted to Licensee Pending Suit. The court held that the licensee had a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favour, and the license was irrevocable under Section 60(b) of the Indian Easements Act, 1882.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Wework India Management Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave Under Clause XIV Letters Patent to Combine Passing Off with Infringement Cause of Action to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings. The court held that once jurisdiction over infringement is established, leave to combine passing off claim should be granted to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

18 Jan 2014

The Plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and Another, filed a suit for infringement of their registered trademarks, including 'UltraTech Cement', and ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)