Search Results for "CESTAT"

30 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of Benzene and Toluene Based on Purity Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and Procedural Compliance Under Central Excise Rules, 1944 Were Upheld by Tribunal.

The appeals arose from a common order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning classification and duty demands on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Customs Authorities in Classification Dispute Over Imported Goods as High Speed Diesel. Goods Classified as Prohibited High Speed Diesel Under Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Leading to Confiscation and Penalties Under Customs Act, 1962.

The dispute centered on the classification of imported goods by three appellant companies, who declared them as Base Oil under Chapter Heading 2710196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CENVAT Credit on Exempted Goods Upheld by Bombay High Court. Factual findings and reliance on precedents render Revenue’s appeal untenable.

Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Daman Commissionerate v. Huhtamaki PPL Ltd.Central Excise – CENVAT Credit on exempted goods – Whether c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Dismisses B.V. Jewels' Plea, Upholds Interest Demand on Customs Liability" "Customs Act’s interest provisions reaffirmed; liabilities clarified."

Acts and Sections Discussed: Customs Act, 1962: Section 18(3): Interest on final/re-assessment orders. Section 28: Recovery of duties not levie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal in Second-Hand Vehicle Import Case. Court Upholds CESTAT's Ruling, Finds No Legal Violation in Import of Toyota Van.

The Bombay High Court, in this case, addressed an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs regarding the import of a second-hand motor vehicle. The vehic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Directs Cash Refund: Writ Petitions Grant Relief on CENVAT Credit. Judgement rules in favor of petitioners, mandates cash refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 for excess duty payments.

Writ Petition Outcome captures the essence of the court's decision to grant relief based on the interpretation of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms CESTAT's Ruling: Labelling Constitutes Manufacturing under Central Excise Law. The Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of "manufacture" under Note 3 of Chapter 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, supporting the respondent's cenvat credit claim.

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether labelling goods amounts to "manufacture" under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The case revolved aroun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal’s Remand in Madura Coats Case: Prejudice Claim to be Argued Afresh. Appeal challenges modification of tribunal order; Supreme Court affirms remand with liberty for appellant to argue prejudice caused by non-furnishing of a document.

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal by Madura Coats Pvt. Ltd. against a High Court order that remanded a case to the Customs, Excise, and Service Ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Intervention Application in Customs Act Criminal Proceedings. Applicant Sought Clarification of Earlier Judgment to Quash Pending Cases, But Court Held Each Court Must Test Facts for Applicability of Binding Law.

The background of the dispute involved a miscellaneous application filed by Amit Jalan, who was not a party to the original proceedings in Criminal Ap...