High Court of Gujarat Upholds Petition for Arrears of Salary for Deceased Employee Due to Tribunal's Perverse Order. Tribunal's Denial of Salary Arrears Found Unjustified as Delay in Appeal Was Not Caused by Deceased Employee.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a dispute regarding the payment of arrears of salary to the widow of a deceased employee, Rameshbhai Kalidas Joshi, who was removed from service due to alleged misconduct. The employee had filed an application against his removal, which was treated as an appeal by the High Court. The Tribunal later denied the arrears of salary for the period from the date of removal until the appeal was decided, citing the employee's delay in filing the appeal. The petitioners contended that the Tribunal's decision was illegal and perverse. The court analyzed the circumstances surrounding the filing of the appeal and found that the deceased employee had not caused any delay, as the application was initially treated as an appeal by the District Development Officer. The court concluded that the Tribunal's order was unjustified and set it aside, directing the respondent to pay the arrears of salary to the widow within three months, along with interest if delayed. The court also awarded costs to the petitioners. The judgment emphasized the importance of fair treatment in employment matters and the need for timely payment of dues to the deceased's family.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Arrears of Salary - Tribunal's Order - Special Civil Application, 1984 - The Tribunal's refusal to grant arrears of salary for the period from removal to appeal decision was found to be perverse as the deceased employee did not cause any delay in filing the appeal. The court directed the respondent to pay the arrears of salary to the widow of the deceased employee along with interest if not paid within the stipulated time. Held that the order of the Tribunal was set aside (Paras 4-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal's order declining to grant arrears of pay to the deceased employee was legal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court set aside the Tribunal's order declining to grant arrears of salary to the deceased employee for the period from removal until the appeal decision. The respondent was directed to pay the arrears to the widow within three months, along with interest if not paid in time, and to pay costs of Rs.1000 to the petitioners.

Law Points

  • Writ jurisdiction
  • Arrears of salary
  • Delay in appeal
  • Tribunal's order
  • Misconduct
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Special Civil Application No 289 of 1984

1996-07-23

S.K. Keshote

B.C. Dave

Heirs of deceased Rameshbhai Kalidas Joshi

District Development Officer, Vadodara

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order regarding salary arrears.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought payment of arrears of salary for the deceased employee.

Filing Reason

The petition was filed due to the Tribunal's refusal to grant salary arrears.

Previous Decisions

The High Court had previously directed that the application be treated as an appeal.

Issues

Legality of the Tribunal's order declining salary arrears Responsibility for delay in filing the appeal

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the Tribunal's order was perverse and unjustified. The respondent's position was not represented in the hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the delay in filing the appeal was not attributable to the deceased employee, and thus the Tribunal's refusal to grant salary arrears was unjustified.

Judgment Excerpts

The only contention made by the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the order of the Tribunal to the extent where it declined to grant the arrears of pay to deceased Rameshbhai Kalidas Joshi for the period from the date he was relieved till 7.7.1982 is illegal. The Tribunal has declined to grant back wages for the period from the date of removal to the date on which appeal has been decided on the ground that the deceased employee is responsible for delay in filing of the appeal. In view of this fact, it cannot be said that the petitioner made any delay in filing of the appeal.

Procedural History

The petitioner was removed from service on 16.12.76. An application was filed on 2.3.77, which was treated as an appeal by the High Court on 23.11.1981. The Tribunal later denied salary arrears, leading to the present writ petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Special Civil Application:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Reservation in Promotion Policy of Mumbai Port Trust; Office Memorandum Dated 21 January 2002 Under Scrutiny. Petitioners Allege Violation of M. Nagaraj Principles and 100% Reservation for SC/ST in Office Superint...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Administrative Tribunal's Order on Promotion Selection. The Tribunal erred by assuming the role of the Selection Committee and making selections based on conjecture rather than directing a proper reconsideration of...