Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Criminal Case from Beed to Thane on Grounds of Convenience and Hardship of Wife. Court also exercises inherent power to restore dismissed DV application to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 773
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Pooja Sanjay Gondage, filed a criminal application under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking transfer of RCC No. 203/2018 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC), Majalgaon, District Beed to JMFC, Thane. The applicant is the wife of respondent no. 2 and resides in Thane with her mother, brothers, and her minor son born in 2016. She is the primary caregiver for her son and faces severe financial constraints as her mother is a debris collector and her brothers are young with no fixed income. The applicant had also filed a DV Application No. 398/2018 before JMFC, Thane, which was dismissed for default on 08.09.2023 due to her inability to attend proceedings. The applicant sought transfer of the criminal case to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and to ensure her convenience and safety. The respondents (husband and in-laws) were served but remained absent. The learned APP for the State submitted that appropriate orders may be passed under Section 407 CrPC. The High Court, after considering the submissions and the provisions of Section 407 CrPC, particularly clause (c) which allows transfer if it tends to the general convenience of parties or is expedient for the ends of justice, allowed the application. The Court also exercised its inherent power to restore the dismissed DV Application No. 398/2018, directing the JMFC, Thane to restore the same and proceed in accordance with law. The Court held that the transfer and restoration would avoid multiplicity of proceedings and provide relief to the applicant who is uneducated and financially constrained.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Cases - Section 407 CrPC - Convenience of Parties - The High Court allowed transfer of RCC No. 203/2018 from JMFC, Majalgaon, Beed to JMFC, Thane considering the severe financial constraints, hardship, and safety concerns of the applicant-wife who resides in Thane with her minor son and is the primary caregiver. The Court held that transfer is expedient for the ends of justice under Section 407(1)(c) CrPC. (Paras 9-11)

B) Criminal Procedure - Inherent Powers - Restoration of Dismissed DV Application - The High Court, while exercising powers under Section 407 CrPC, restored the DV Application No. 398/2018 which was dismissed for default on 08.09.2023, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and to provide solace to the applicant who is uneducated and financially constrained. The Court directed the JMFC, Thane to restore the DV application and proceed in accordance with law. (Paras 10-11)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the criminal case pending before JMFC, Majalgaon, District Beed should be transferred to JMFC, Thane on grounds of convenience and hardship faced by the applicant-wife, and whether the High Court can restore the dismissed DV application in the same proceedings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the application. It ordered the transfer of RCC No. 203/2018 from JMFC, Majalgaon, District Beed to JMFC, Thane. It further directed the JMFC, Thane to restore DV Application No. 398/2018 which was dismissed for default on 08.09.2023 and to proceed in accordance with law. The Court also directed the JMFC, Thane to decide the DV application expeditiously and preferably within six months from the date of restoration.

Law Points

  • Transfer of criminal cases under Section 407 CrPC
  • Convenience of parties and witnesses
  • Ends of justice
  • Inherent power of High Court to restore dismissed proceedings
  • Avoidance of multiplicity of proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (10) 162

Criminal Application No. 311 of 2021

2024-10-16

Milind N. Jadhav

2024:BHC-AS:41132

Ms. Rekha Musale, Ms. Shama Mulla, Ms. Tejasweeta Bhosale (for Applicant), Ms. Sangita E. Phad (APP for State)

Pooja Sanjay Gondage

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application for transfer of a criminal case from one JMFC court to another, and for restoration of a dismissed DV application.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of RCC No. 203/2018 from JMFC, Majalgaon, District Beed to JMFC, Thane, and restoration of DV Application No. 398/2018 dismissed for default.

Filing Reason

The applicant-wife faces severe financial constraints, hardship, and safety concerns in traveling from Thane to Beed for court proceedings, and seeks to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

Previous Decisions

DV Application No. 398/2018 was dismissed for default on 08.09.2023 by JMFC, Thane.

Issues

Whether the criminal case should be transferred from JMFC, Majalgaon, Beed to JMFC, Thane under Section 407 CrPC. Whether the High Court can restore the dismissed DV application in the same proceedings.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant's counsel submitted that the applicant resides in Thane with her minor son and faces severe financial constraints; she is the primary caregiver; her mother is a debris collector and brothers are young with no fixed income; she has filed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 406 r/w 34 IPC; the DV application was dismissed for default due to her inability to attend; transfer is necessary for convenience and ends of justice. State's APP submitted that appropriate orders may be passed under Section 407 CrPC in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court has power under Section 407(1)(c) CrPC to transfer a case if it tends to the general convenience of parties or is expedient for the ends of justice. The Court also has inherent power to restore a dismissed application to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and to provide relief to a litigant facing hardship.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the facts in the present case which have been... I am of the considered opinion that the present Application deserves to be allowed.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application No. 311 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court seeking transfer of RCC No. 203/2018 from JMFC, Majalgaon, Beed to JMFC, Thane. The application was filed in 2021 and remained pending due to non-appearance of respondents. The matter was heard on 16.10.2024 and decided.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 407
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 498-A, 323, 504, 406, 34
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act):
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Maintainability of Gratuity Application Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Dispute Over Quantum of Contractual Gratuity Under Section 4(5) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Falls Within Jurisdict...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Division Bench Considers Appeals Against Quashing of SC/ST Liquor License Reservation Notification. Single Judge Quashed Notification as Discriminatory, State Appeals.