High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal for Mesne Profits Due to Trial Court Error. Court Found Plaintiffs Entitled to Rs.7230/- as Mesne Profits Based on Commissioner's Report Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute involved a claim for mesne profits by the appellants, heirs of Ishverlal Tansukhlal, against the respondents, heirs of Vasantlal Mulji Ved, concerning immovable property known as 'Tansukhram's Hissa'. The original plaintiffs filed a suit on 25-11-1966 seeking possession, accounts, and partition of the property. The Civil Judge decreed the suit on 28th February 1967, affirming the plaintiffs' half share in the joint properties and ordering the defendants to render accounts. A Commissioner was appointed, who reported on 11-9-1967 that the plaintiffs were owed Rs.7230/- by the defendants. The plaintiffs sought a final decree for possession and mesne profits, but the trial judge's final decree on 28th January 1975 did not address the mesne profits. The appellants contended that the trial judge misconstrued the preliminary decree and failed to award the mesne profits as determined by the Commissioner. The court analyzed the Commissioner's findings and the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, concluding that the trial judge erred in not awarding the mesne profits. The appeal was allowed, and the plaintiffs were declared entitled to recover Rs.7230/- with interest from the date of the Commissioner's report. No costs were awarded in the appeal.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Mesne Profits - Entitlement to Mesne Profits - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order XX, Rule 12 - The court held that the trial judge erred in not awarding mesne profits to the plaintiffs despite the Commissioner's report indicating dues payable by the defendant. The plaintiffs were entitled to recover Rs.7230/- as mesne profits with interest from the date of the Commissioner's report (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court erred in not awarding mesne profits to the plaintiffs as determined by the Commissioner.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was allowed, and it was declared that the plaintiffs recover Rs.7230/- from respondent-defendant No.2 as mesne profits with interest at 6% from the date of the Commissioner's report until realization. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • mesne profits
  • final decree
  • Civil Procedure Code
  • accounts
  • possession
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

First Appeal No 1071 of 1975

1996-11-25

MR.JUSTICE K.R.VYAS

Mr. Mehul S.Shah for Mr. S.M.Shah

Heirs of Ishverlal Tansukhlal

Heirs of Vasantlal Mulji Ved

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Claim for mesne profits and possession of immovable property.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiffs sought recovery of mesne profits from the defendants.

Filing Reason

Plaintiffs filed suit for possession and accounts regarding their share of property.

Previous Decisions

The trial court had decreed the suit but did not address mesne profits.

Issues

Whether the trial court erred in not awarding mesne profits to the plaintiffs as determined by the Commissioner.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the trial judge misconstrued the preliminary decree and failed to award mesne profits. Commissioner's report indicated dues payable by the defendant to the plaintiffs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the trial judge's failure to award mesne profits, as determined by the Commissioner's report, constituted an error, mandating the award of the specified amount under the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned trial Judge has committed an error in not passing the decree to the extent of Rs.7230/- for mesne profits in favour of the plaintiffs. In view of this provision, in my view, the learned trial Judge has committed an error in not passing the decree to the extent of Rs.7230/- for mesne profits in favour of the plaintiffs.

Procedural History

The plaintiffs filed a suit on 25-11-1966, which was decreed on 28-02-1967. A Commissioner was appointed, and a report was submitted on 11-09-1967. The final decree was passed on 28-01-1975, leading to the present appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XX, Rule 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Restoring License of Bachat Gat in Fair Price Shop Irregularities Case — Violation of Natural Justice Due to Non-Hearing of Complainant. License Suspension for Lifting Food Grains During Suspension Period ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Speaker's Decision on Disqualification in Anti-Defection Case — Clarifies Role of Political Parties and Whips.