Court Upholds Petitioner's Request for Electricity Reconnection Based on Installment Payment Agreement. Court Allows Payment of Delayed Charges in Installments to Facilitate Reconnection of Electricity Supply.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a Civil Revision Application filed by a widow against the Gujarat Electricity Board concerning the disconnection of her electricity supply. The petitioner claimed that she had paid the disputed bill amount and sought reconnection of her electricity supply. However, the Board contended that the petitioner was liable for delayed payment charges amounting to Rs.10,999.47 as of November 30, 1995. The petitioner, represented by counsel, argued for the possibility of paying these charges in installments due to her financial constraints. The Board's counsel did not object to this proposal, provided the petitioner agreed to pay the delayed charges along with any further charges incurred until January 31, 1996. The court, after hearing both parties, issued directions for the reconnection of electricity supply contingent upon the petitioner’s written undertaking to pay the delayed charges in monthly installments of Rs.750 until the total amount was settled. The court also stipulated that in case of default, the Board could disconnect the supply again. The rule was made absolute to this extent, with no costs awarded.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Reconnection of Electricity Supply - Conditions for Reconnection - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The court directed the Gujarat Electricity Board to reconnect the electricity supply to the petitioner upon her undertaking to pay delayed payment charges in installments. The petitioner, a widow, was unable to pay the full amount at once, and the court allowed for installment payments to facilitate reconnection (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to reconnection of electricity supply upon agreeing to pay delayed payment charges in installments.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the Gujarat Electricity Board to reconnect the electricity supply upon the petitioner's written undertaking to pay delayed payment charges in installments of Rs.750 per month until the total amount was settled. The Board was granted liberty to disconnect the supply in case of default.

Law Points

  • Civil procedure
  • Electricity supply
  • Reconnection charges
  • Delayed payment charges
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Civil Revision Application No 127 of 96

1996-02-05

MR.JUSTICE S.D.SHAH

MR PK JANI, MR MD PANDYA

VEENABEN DAHYABHAI CHAUHAN

GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil Revision Application regarding electricity supply disconnection

Remedy Sought

Reconnection of electricity supply with payment of delayed charges

Filing Reason

Disconnection of electricity supply by the Gujarat Electricity Board

Previous Decisions

Application dismissed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 65 of 1993

Issues

Entitlement to reconnection of electricity supply Payment of delayed charges in installments

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for installment payments due to financial constraints Board agreed to reconnection if delayed charges were paid

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the need for reasonable payment arrangements for individuals in financial distress while ensuring compliance with payment obligations.

Judgment Excerpts

Respondent - Gujarat Electricity Board is directed to re-connect the electricity supply to the petitioner on petitioner agreeing and undertaking before this Court within fifteen days from today in writing to make payment of delayed payment charges. Rule is accordingly made absolute to the aforesaid extent only.

Procedural History

The application was made against the order passed below Exhibit-19 in Regular Civil Appeal No. 65 of 1993, which was dismissed prior to this revision application.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Consent Terms Binding on Successor Developer. Petitioners' Entitlement to Two Shops of 409 Sq Ft Each Upheld Based on Consent Terms in Suit No.1994 of 2008.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Hawkers' Rights in Street Vending Case — Emphasizes Need for Regulation. Citing Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, the Court affirmed the fundamental right of hawkers to conduct business on public streets, subject to reason...