Case Note & Summary
The case involved a criminal revision filed by the revisionist against an order dated 24.05.1994, which allowed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The revision was dismissed on 14.07.1995, and subsequently, a recall/restoration application was filed to revisit this dismissal. However, after 27 years, the revisionist indicated a loss of interest in the matter and did not wish to pursue it further. The court considered this lack of interest and the significant passage of time before deciding to dismiss the recall/restoration application. The final order was issued on 03.11.2022, concluding the matter without further proceedings.
Headnote
A) Criminal Procedure - Recall Application - Dismissal of Recall Application - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 125 - The revisionist expressed a lack of interest in pursuing the matter further after 27 years, leading to the dismissal of the recall/restoration application. The court noted the efflux of time and the revisionist's decision not to continue with the case. Held that the application was dismissed accordingly (Paras Not mentioned).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the recall/restoration application should be allowed despite the revisionist's loss of interest.
Final Decision
The recall/restoration application was dismissed due to the revisionist's loss of interest in the matter after 27 years.
Law Points
- Criminal Procedure
- Revision
- Recall Application
- Section 125 Cr.P.C.
