Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder Due to Starvation. The appellant's systematic starvation of his wife constituted an attempt to murder under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a dispute concerning the appellant's treatment of his wife, Bimla Devi, leading to allegations of attempted murder through starvation. Bimla Devi was married to the appellant in October 1951, but their relationship deteriorated by 1953 due to maltreatment. In 1956, she was deliberately starved and confined, leading to severe health issues. On June 5, 1956, she escaped to a hospital where her condition was reported as critical. The appellant was initially acquitted at trial, but the High Court found sufficient evidence of his intention to cause harm through a systematic deprivation of food. The appellant argued that his actions did not constitute an attempt to murder under Section 307, claiming that the act of starvation alone could not have caused death without a longer duration. The court held that the intention to commit murder and the act towards its commission were sufficient for conviction under Section 307, regardless of whether the act was the last in a series. The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the conviction based on the evidence of systematic starvation and the appellant's intent to accelerate his wife's death.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Ingredients of Offence - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307 - A person commits an offence under Section 307 when he has the intention to commit murder and does an act towards its commission, irrespective of whether that act is the last act or not. The appellant's conduct of regularly starving his wife constituted a series of acts that fell within the purview of Section 307, leading to his conviction. Held that the High Court was correct in convicting the appellant under this section (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's actions constituted an attempt to murder under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's conviction of the appellant under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code for attempting to murder his wife through starvation.

Law Points

  • Attempt to murder
  • Indian Penal Code
  • intention to commit murder
  • series of acts
  • culpable homicide
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Criminal Appeal No. 177 of 1959

1961-04-24

K. Subba Rao, Raghubar Dayal

Jai Gopal Sethi, R. L. Kohli, B. K. Khanna, R.H. Debhar, D. Gupta

Om Parkash

State of Punjab

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal regarding conviction for attempted murder.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to overturn his conviction.

Filing Reason

The appellant was convicted for attempting to murder his wife through starvation.

Previous Decisions

The trial court acquitted the appellant, but the High Court reversed this decision.

Issues

Whether the appellant's actions constituted an attempt to murder under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant contended that his actions did not constitute an attempt to murder as the act of starvation alone could not cause death. The prosecution argued that the systematic starvation demonstrated intent to commit murder.

Ratio Decidendi

A person commits an offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code when he has the intention to commit murder and performs an act towards its commission, regardless of whether that act is the last act in a series.

Judgment Excerpts

A person commits an offence under s. 307 of the Indian Penal Code when he has an intention to commit murder and in pursuance of that intention does an act towards its commission irrespective of the fact whether that act is the penultimate act or not. The word 'act' in s. 307 did not mean only a particular act of a person, but denoted, according to s. 33 of the Code, as well, a series of acts.

Procedural History

The appellant was initially acquitted by the trial court. The High Court reversed this decision and convicted the appellant under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code: 307, 308, 511
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Arrest of Vessel Due to Valid Termination of Charterparty. The court found that the termination of the Bareboat Charterparty was valid and that the Respondent's claim for arrest was unsustainable.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Restores Title of Property to Widow After Finding of Possession. The court held that possession continues with the title holder unless adverse possession is established, which was not proven by the respondents.