High Court Grants Time for Defect Removal in Second Appeal — Procedural Compliance Required.

High Court: Patna High Court
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a second appeal filed by the appellant, Prem Nandan Prasad, against the respondents, Bhrigu Nandan Prasad and others. The court noted that defects had been pointed out by the office regarding the appeal. On 23rd August 2010, the court granted the appellant time until the following day to rectify these defects. The court made it clear that failure to do so would result in the automatic rejection of the appeal against the respondents without further reference to a bench. This decision emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in civil litigation.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Second Appeal - Time for Defect Removal - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section Not mentioned - The court granted time to the appellant to remove defects pointed out by the office, failing which the appeal would be rejected against the concerned respondents without further reference. Held that procedural compliance is necessary for the continuation of the appeal (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant can be granted time to remove defects in the second appeal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court granted the appellant time until the next day to remove the defects, failing which the appeal would be rejected.

Law Points

  • Defect removal
  • Second appeal procedure
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

C.R. No.204 of 1994

2010-08-23

Dr. Ravi Ranjan

Prem Nandan Prasad

Bhrigu Nandan Prasad & Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second appeal regarding procedural defects.

Remedy Sought

Appellant seeks to continue the appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects pointed out by the office.

Issues

Whether the appellant can be granted time to remove defects in the second appeal.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant requested time to rectify defects.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the necessity of procedural compliance for the continuation of appeals.

Judgment Excerpts

As prayed, time till tomorrow is granted to the appellant for removing the defect as pointed out by the office.

Procedural History

The court noted the defects in the second appeal and granted time for rectification.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Reduces Conviction from Rape to Indecent Assault Due to Insufficient Evidence. The court found that the evidence did not establish penetration necessary for a rape conviction under Section 376 IPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Death Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case — Confessions Found Voluntary Despite Short Reflection Time.