Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Notification Under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 — Notification Held Ultra Vires. The notification prescribing minimum wages for stone-breaking and stone-crushing operations in mines was found to be ultra vires as it did not fall under the scheduled employment defined in the Act.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by the Madhya Pradesh Mineral Industry Association challenging the validity of a notification issued by the Madhya Pradesh Government under Section 5(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. The notification prescribed minimum wages for stone-breaking and stone-crushing operations in mines, which the appellant contended were ultra vires the Act. The High Court had dismissed the appellant's writ petition, leading to the appeal before the Supreme Court. The core legal issue was whether the operations of stone-breaking and stone-crushing in the manganese mining industry fell within the scope of item 8 in Part I of the Schedule to the Minimum Wages Act. The Supreme Court analyzed the definitions and provisions of the Act, concluding that the notification was invalid as it did not pertain to the scheduled employment defined in the Act. The Court emphasized that the appropriate government could add items to the Schedule under Section 27 if it desired to regulate such employment. Ultimately, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and ruled that the impugned notification could not be enforced, granting costs to the appellant.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Validity of Notification - Ultra Vires - Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Section 5(2) - The Supreme Court held that the notification prescribing minimum wages for stone-breaking and stone-crushing operations in mines was ultra vires as it did not fall under the scheduled employment defined in the Act. The Court concluded that the operations in question were not intended to be covered by the Act, and thus the notification could not be enforced (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the notification issued by the Madhya Pradesh Government under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, was valid and applicable to stone-breaking and stone-crushing operations in the manganese mining industry.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and ruled that the impugned notification was invalid and could not be enforced, granting costs to the appellant.

Law Points

  • Minimum Wages
  • Notification Validity
  • Ultra Vires
  • Scheduled Employment
  • Interpretation of Statutes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Civil Appeal No. 389 of 1959

1960-04-07

P. B. Gajendragadkar, K. N. Wanchoo, K. C. Das Gupta

A. S. Bobde, Ganpat Rai, H. J. Umrigar, K. L. Hathi, R.H. Dhebar

Madhya Pradesh Mineral Industry Association

Regional Labour Commissioner, Jabalpur and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the validity of a government notification under the Minimum Wages Act.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought a writ quashing the notification as ultra vires.

Filing Reason

The appellant alleged that the notification was invalid and threatened prosecution for non-compliance.

Previous Decisions

The High Court dismissed the appellant's petition, finding the notification valid.

Issues

Whether the notification was ultra vires the Minimum Wages Act, 1948. Whether stone-breaking and stone-crushing operations in mines are included in the scheduled employment under the Act.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the notification did not pertain to any scheduled employment as defined in the Act. The respondents contended that the operations were covered under the Act and the notification was valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The notification issued under Section 5(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, was held to be ultra vires as it did not pertain to the scheduled employment defined in the Act, emphasizing the need for clarity in legislative delegation and the scope of employment covered.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned notification was, therefore, ultra vires s. 5(2) of the Act and could not be enforced. It is clear that the High Court was in error in assuming that the vires of the impugned notification had been conceded by the appellant before it.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the notification, which was dismissed. The High Court granted a certificate of fitness under Article 133(1)(c) for appeal to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Minimum Wages Act, 1948: 5(2), 27
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Impleadment in Land Acquisition Reference Proceedings; Holds Reference Court Lacks Power to Implead Parties Not Before Collector Under Section 30 Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Application by Non-Parties to Collector's Referenc...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Certiorari and Authority's Jurisdiction in Payment of Wages Act Dispute. Error of Law Apparent on Face of Record in Misconstruing Agreement Clauses Allows High Court Interference Under Article 226 and Confirms Autho...