Supreme Court Upholds Minority Union's Right to Terminate Award Under Industrial Disputes Act — Clarifies Scope of Section 19(6).

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an industrial dispute between the Associated Cement Companies Limited and their workmen, represented by two unions following the cancellation of the registration of the original union. The appellant contended that the Cement Kamdar Mandal, a minority union, lacked the authority to terminate awards binding on all workmen under Section 19(6) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The dispute arose after the Cement Kamdar Mandal issued notices to terminate previous awards, which led to the matter being referred to the Industrial Tribunal. The Tribunal found against the appellant, leading to the present appeal. The core legal issue was whether a minority union could issue a notice to terminate an award. The court examined the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, particularly Sections 18 and 19, and concluded that the term 'any party bound by the award' encompasses all workmen, allowing a minority union to act collectively to terminate an award. The court emphasized that imposing a majority requirement would hinder the ability of minority workmen to seek changes to awards, thus dismissing the appeal and affirming the Tribunal's decision.

Headnote

A) Industrial Disputes - Termination of Award - Rights of Minority Union - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 19(6) - The court held that a minority union can terminate an award by giving notice under Section 19(6), as the expression 'any party bound by the award' includes all workmen bound by the award, not just those representing a majority. This interpretation ensures that the rights of minority workmen to raise disputes are protected, allowing them to act collectively to terminate awards (Paras 157-167).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a registered trade union representing a minority of workmen governed by an award can give notice to terminate the award under Section 19(6) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal's decision that a minority union can terminate an award under Section 19(6) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

Law Points

  • Termination of award
  • minority union rights
  • Industrial Disputes Act interpretation
  • collective action by workmen
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Civil Appeal No. 404 of 1958

1960-03-03

P. B. Gajendragadkar, A. K. Sarkar, K. C. Das Gupta

M. O. Setalvad, R. J. Kolah, S. N. Andley, J. B. Dadachanji, Rameshwar Nath, P. L. Vohra, Janardan Sharma

Associated Cement Companies Limited

Their Workmen

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Industrial dispute regarding the termination of awards by a minority union.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to challenge the Tribunal's decision allowing a minority union to terminate the award.

Filing Reason

The appellant claimed that the minority union lacked authority to terminate the award.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal found against the appellant, allowing the minority union's notice to terminate the award.

Issues

Whether a minority union can terminate an award under Section 19(6) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that only a majority union could terminate the award. The respondents contended that a minority union has the right to terminate the award collectively.

Ratio Decidendi

A minority union can collectively terminate an award under Section 19(6) of the Industrial Disputes Act, as the term 'any party bound by the award' includes all workmen, not just those representing a majority.

Judgment Excerpts

Held, that the effect of s. 18 is that an award properly made by an industrial tribunal governs the employer and all those who represent him. On a fair and reasonable reading of s. 19(6), the true position is that... notice to terminate the said award can be given not by an individual workman but by a group of workmen acting collectively.

Procedural History

The dispute was referred to the Industrial Tribunal by the Saurashtra Government under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Tribunal delivered an interlocutory judgment on March 10, 1958, finding against the appellant on preliminary objections regarding the competence of the reference.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: Section 18, Section 19(6)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Review of Interim Maintenance Order in Partition Suit — Review Without Change in Circumstances Not Permissible Under Section 151 CPC. The court restored the maintenance order of Rs.500 per month gr...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Termination of Conductor for Misconduct — Upholds High Court's Ruling.