Supreme Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging Election of Punjab Chief Minister — Lambardars Not Revenue Officers. Citing the clear legislative definitions, the court held that lambardars are excluded from the definition of revenue officers under Section 123(7)(f) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an election petition filed by Sardar Gurmej Singh challenging the election of Sardar Partap Singh Kairon to the Punjab Legislative Assembly from the Sarhali constituency. The appellant contended that the respondent had appointed lambardars as polling and counting agents, which constituted a corrupt practice under Section 123(7) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The Election Tribunal initially ruled against the respondent, classifying lambardars as revenue officers and village accountants. However, the Punjab High Court overturned this decision, stating that lambardars were excluded from the definition of revenue officers under the Act. The Supreme Court, upon appeal, examined the definitions and roles of lambardars and village accountants, concluding that lambardars do not qualify as revenue officers or village accountants as per the statutory definitions. The court emphasized the importance of precise legislative language and the historical distinction between the roles of village headmen and accountants. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed, and the court expressed concern over the delay in resolving the election petition, urging for its expeditious disposal. The final decision confirmed that the respondent did not engage in corrupt practices by appointing lambardars as agents.

Headnote

A) Election Law - Corrupt Practices - Definition of Revenue Officers - Lambardars are excluded from the definition of revenue officers under Section 123(7)(f) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 - The court held that lambardars, being village revenue officers, do not fall within the category of revenue officers as defined in the Act, thus the respondent did not commit corrupt practices by appointing them as polling agents. (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appointment of lambardars as polling and counting agents amounts to corrupt practice under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Corrupt practices
  • election petition
  • lambardars
  • revenue officers
  • village accountants
  • Representation of the People Act
  • 1951
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Civil Appeal No. 324 of 1959

1959-09-30

S. R. Das, S. K. Das, A. K. Sarkar, K. Subba Rao, M. Hidayatullah

N. C. Chatterjee, Janardan Sharma, G. S. Pathak, H. S. Doabia, Gopal Singh, P. S. Safeer

Sardar Gurmej Singh

Sardar Partap Singh Kairon

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows MBBS Admission Under Hilly Area Reservation for Student Who Studied in Adjacent Hilly Tahsil. The court held that the requirement of studying in a hilly area is satisfied if the student studied in any hilly area, not necessar...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Murder of Government Officials in RTO Office Shooting. Conviction Under IPC Sections 302, 307, 332, 333, 201 and Arms Act Sections 3 and 25 Challenged; Trial...