Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Court Fees on Certified Copies. The requirement for court fees on certified copies of criminal orders is upheld as consistent with the provisions of the Court Fees Act, 1870.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by Bibhuti Bhusan Chatterjee against the orders passed by the Magistrate and confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge under Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appellant challenged the requirement to pay court fees on certified copies of orders filed with his Criminal Revision Application in the High Court at Patna. The High Court had ruled that such copies were chargeable with court fees, consistent with its prevailing practice and Article 9 of the Court Fees Act, 1870. The appellant argued that the legislative intent behind the Code of Criminal Procedure was to provide accused persons with necessary documents free of charge, and thus requiring court fees on certified copies was inconsistent with this policy. The Supreme Court analyzed the provisions of the Court Fees Act and concluded that the requirement for court fees on certified copies of criminal orders was valid. The court emphasized that the language of Article 9 was clear and did not support the appellant's arguments regarding legislative policy. Ultimately, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's decision and the requirement for court fees on certified copies.

Headnote

A) Court Fees - Chargeability of Certified Copies - Requirement of Court Fees on Criminal Orders - Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 4, Article 9 - The court held that certified copies of criminal judgments or orders intended for filing before the High Court must bear the court fee stamp as prescribed by Article 9 of the Court Fees Act, 1870. The court reasoned that the provisions of the Act are clear and unambiguous, and any hypothetical considerations regarding the policy of the Code of Criminal Procedure are irrelevant. Held that the High Court's practice was justified (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether certified copies of criminal orders are chargeable with court fees under the Court Fees Act, 1870.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's ruling that certified copies of criminal orders must bear the prescribed court fees.

Law Points

  • Court Fees
  • Judicial Proceedings
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Revision Application
  • Legislative Policy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Criminal Appeal No. 199 of 1957

1959-10-06

P. B. Gajendragadkar, K. Subba Rao

P. K. Chatterjee, N. S. Bindra, D. Gupta

Bibhuti Bhusan Chatterjee

The State of Bihar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal regarding the chargeability of court fees on certified copies of criminal orders.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to challenge the requirement to pay court fees.

Filing Reason

The appellant filed a Criminal Revision Application against orders passed by the Magistrate and Additional Sessions Judge.

Previous Decisions

The High Court had ruled that certified copies were chargeable with court fees.

Issues

Chargeability of court fees on certified copies of criminal orders Interpretation of Article 9 of the Court Fees Act

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that requiring court fees was inconsistent with the legislative policy of providing documents free of charge. The respondent maintained that the High Court's practice was justified under the Court Fees Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the provisions of the Court Fees Act, particularly Article 9, clearly required court fees on certified copies of criminal orders intended for filing before the High Court.

Judgment Excerpts

The High Court committed no illegality. The present case was an exceptional case of that nature.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a Criminal Revision Application in the High Court against the orders of the Magistrate and Additional Sessions Judge, which was dismissed, leading to the appeal in the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Court Fees Act, 1870: Section 4, Article 9
  • Code of Criminal Procedure: Section 107
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Act of State Case — Resumption of Property Declared Justiciable. The act of resumption by the Administrator was held to be an act of State and not justiciable in municipal courts.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Emergency Arbitrator's Award and Clarifies Appealability of Enforcement Orders. The Court ruled that an Emergency Arbitrator's award is enforceable under Section 17(1) of the Arbitration Act, and orders under Section 17(2) are a...