Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Presidential Election Validity — Jurisdiction and Procedure Governed by Statute. The right to challenge an election is governed by the provisions of the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952.

  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a petition filed by Dr. N. B. Khare, an intending candidate for the presidential election, challenging the validity of the election held on May 6, 1957, in which Shri Rajendra Prasad was declared elected. The petitioner alleged violations of constitutional provisions and sought to have the election quashed. However, the Registrar of the Supreme Court returned the petition, stating it did not comply with the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952, and the Supreme Court Rules. The petitioner contended that the Act and Rules were void as they limited the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under Article 71(1) and that he had a right as a citizen to approach the Court for relief. The Court analyzed the statutory framework, emphasizing that Article 71 merely designated the forum for disputes, while the Act and Rules outlined the procedure for challenging elections. The Court concluded that the petitioner had no rights outside those conferred by the statute and dismissed the appeal, affirming the validity of the Act and Rules governing election petitions.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Presidential Election Validity - Jurisdiction and Procedure - Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952, Sections 14, 18 - The Supreme Court held that the right to challenge an election is governed by the provisions of the Act and the Rules, and the petitioner must comply with these statutory requirements to file an application for setting aside an election. The petition was dismissed as it did not conform to the necessary legal framework (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner had the right to challenge the presidential election under Article 71 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, affirming that the right to challenge an election is governed by the provisions of the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952, and the petitioner must comply with the statutory requirements to file an application for setting aside an election.

Law Points

  • Presidential election validity
  • jurisdiction of Supreme Court
  • statutory rights
  • election petition procedure
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 915 of 1957

1957-10-14

S. R. Das, Venkatarama Aiyar, S. K. Das, J. L. Kapur, Vivian Bose

R. V. S Mani, Gangat Rai

Dr. N. B. Khare

Election Commission of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the validity of the presidential election.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the presidential election.

Filing Reason

Allegations of constitutional violations during the election.

Previous Decisions

The petition was returned by the Registrar for non-compliance with statutory requirements.

Issues

Whether the petitioner had the right to challenge the presidential election under Article 71. Whether the Act and Rules governing election petitions were valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to decide election validity. Petitioner contended that the Act and Rules derogate from the Supreme Court's jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to challenge an election must be conferred by statute and can only be enforced in accordance with the conditions laid down therein.

Judgment Excerpts

Art. 71(1) merely prescribes the forum in which doubts and disputes in connection with the election of the President and Vice-President would be enquired into. The right to stand for election and the right to move for setting aside an election are not common law rights.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a petition under Article 71(1) of the Constitution, which was returned by the Registrar for non-compliance with the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952, leading to the present appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections Act, 1952: 14, 18
  • Supreme Court Rules, 1950: Order XXXVII-A, Rules 3, 12
  • Constitution of India: Article 71
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Vendees' Appeal in Pre-emption Suit Holding No Collusion and Suit Within Limitation. Physical Possession of Land Sold Includes Tenant-Occupied Portion and Limitation Under Article 10 of Limitation Act, 1908 Runs From Date of R...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court Direction on Daily Wage Employees' Termination and Re-employment Without Declaring Authority an Industry. High Court's Equitable Application of Principles Akin to Sections 25F and 25G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,...