Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Industrial Dispute Case — Tribunal Lacked Jurisdiction to Order Advance Costs. The Tribunal's order to pay travelling and halting allowances in advance was found to be without jurisdiction under Section 11(7) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by the Punjab National Bank Ltd. against an order of the Industrial Tribunal directing the bank to pay travelling and halting allowances to representatives of various unions during pending adjudication proceedings. The dispute arose from the absorption of Bharat Bank employees into the Punjab National Bank and their service conditions. The Tribunal had ordered the bank to pay allowances despite acknowledging the absence of legal provision supporting such a claim, relying instead on general practice. The bank contended that the Tribunal's order was unjust and without jurisdiction, leading to the appeal. The Supreme Court analyzed the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, particularly Section 11(7), which grants discretion to the Tribunal regarding costs. The court concluded that the Tribunal's order was without jurisdiction as it improperly directed advance payment of costs, which should only be determined at the conclusion of proceedings. The court emphasized that the discretion must be exercised judiciously and not arbitrarily, and that the principles of natural justice do not support penalizing one party by requiring them to pay the costs of another in advance. The appeal was allowed, and the Tribunal's order was set aside, with costs to be borne by the respondents.

Headnote

A) Industrial Disputes - Jurisdiction of Tribunal - Advance Payment of Costs - Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 11(7) - The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to direct the appellant to pay travelling and halting allowances in advance, as the discretion under Section 11(7) must be exercised according to rules of reason and justice, not arbitrarily. The court held that costs are determined at the conclusion of proceedings, not in advance (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Industrial Tribunal had the jurisdiction to order the payment of travelling and halting allowances to representatives of unions in advance during pending proceedings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order regarding advance payment of travelling and halting allowances, and directed that costs be borne by the respondents.

Law Points

  • jurisdiction of tribunal
  • discretion in costs
  • industrial disputes
  • advance payment of costs
  • principles of natural justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Civil Appeal No. 134 of 1955

1956-12-20

S. K. Das

Ram Lal Anand, Naunit Lal, Y. Kumar

Punjab National Bank Ltd.

Sri Ram Kanwar, Industrial Tribunal, Delhi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the order of the Industrial Tribunal regarding costs.

Remedy Sought

Punjab National Bank Ltd. sought to quash the Tribunal's order for advance payment of costs.

Filing Reason

The Tribunal ordered the bank to pay travelling and halting allowances to union representatives.

Previous Decisions

The Punjab High Court dismissed the appellant's petition for a writ of certiorari.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to order advance payment of costs. Whether the discretion under Section 11(7) was exercised correctly.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the Tribunal's order was unjust and without jurisdiction. The respondents contended that the order was justified under Section 11(7) of the Industrial Disputes Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to order advance costs under Section 11(7) of the Industrial Disputes Act, as costs are determined at the conclusion of proceedings, not in advance.

Judgment Excerpts

The order of the Tribunal was without jurisdiction and could not be supported either on the basis of the general practice of the Industrial Courts or with reference to the provisions of s. 11(7) of the Act. The discretion which is given to a Tribunal under s. 11(7) of the Act is a judicial discretion and must be exercised according to the rules of reason and justice.

Procedural History

The Punjab National Bank Ltd. filed an application before the Industrial Tribunal, which ordered the payment of allowances. The bank's petition for a writ of certiorari was dismissed by the Punjab High Court. The bank then obtained special leave from the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: Section 11(1), Section 11(7)
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 35
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Police Restriction on Religious Procession Route; Finds No Absolute Right to Choose Particular Road. Refusal of Preferred Route for Kavad Yatra Did Not Constitute Prohibition of Religious Practice Under Articles 25 and 19(1)...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Non-Resident Company's Tax Assessment — Payment Received in British India.