Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pre-emption Case — Custom of Pre-emption Recognized in Banaras.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a suit for pre-emption initiated by the plaintiff regarding a property in Banaras, which was sold by the defendants, residents of Calcutta. The plaintiff claimed a right of pre-emption based on a local custom prevalent in Banaras, asserting that he was entitled to purchase the property due to its proximity to his own. The trial court dismissed the suit, ruling that while a custom of pre-emption existed, it could not be enforced as neither the vendor nor the vendee were natives or domiciled in Banaras. The High Court upheld this decision, leading the plaintiff to appeal to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court examined the nature of the right of pre-emption under both Muhammadan Law and local custom, concluding that the right is an incident of property that should apply to all owners within the locality, regardless of their origin. The court found that the lower courts had incorrectly limited the custom's applicability and allowed the appeal, directing the High Court to consider unresolved issues regarding the plaintiff's compliance with legal demands for pre-emption.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Pre-emption - Existence of Custom - Indian Law - The Supreme Court recognized a local custom of pre-emption in Banaras applicable to all house properties, irrespective of the owner's nationality or domicile. The court held that the right of pre-emption is an incident of property and not merely a personal right, thus allowing the appeal and setting aside the lower court's judgments (Paras 85-86).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the right of pre-emption exists for non-natives in Banaras under local custom.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, recognizing the existence of a local custom of pre-emption in Banaras applicable to all house properties, and set aside the judgments of the lower courts. The case was remanded to the High Court for consideration of unresolved issues regarding the plaintiff's compliance with legal requirements for pre-emption.

Law Points

  • pre-emption
  • custom
  • Muhammadan Law
  • property rights
  • vicinage
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Civil Appeal No. 15 of 1951

1954-04-23

Mukherjea J.

N. C. Sen, R. C. Prasad, C. K. Daphtary, Solicitor-General for India, S. P. Sinha, C. C. Mukherji, Shaukat Husain, S. P. Varma

Shri Audh Behari Singh

Gajadhar Jaipuria and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal regarding the right of pre-emption.

Remedy Sought

The plaintiff sought enforcement of his right of pre-emption.

Filing Reason

The plaintiff claimed a customary right to pre-empt the sale of property.

Previous Decisions

The trial court and High Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim based on the non-nativity of the vendor and vendee.

Issues

Existence of a custom of pre-emption applicable to non-natives in Banaras Compliance with legal demands for asserting the right of pre-emption

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the custom of pre-emption applies to all property owners in Banaras, regardless of their origin. The respondents contended that the custom is limited to natives or residents of Banaras.

Ratio Decidendi

The right of pre-emption is an incident of property and not merely a personal right, applicable to all property owners in the locality under local custom.

Judgment Excerpts

We hold that there is no force in this appeal and dismiss it with costs. The right of pre-emption is an incident of property and attaches to the land itself.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed a suit in the Civil Judge's Court at Banaras, which was dismissed. The plaintiff appealed to the High Court, which upheld the trial court's decision. The plaintiff then appealed to the Supreme Court, which allowed the appeal and remanded the case for further consideration.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Arbitral Award Passed Outside State — Stamp Duty Payable Only Where Award is Made Under Section 3 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. Arbitral Award Made in Mumbai Not Subject to Karnataka Stamp Duty W...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction in Dowry Death Case. Trial Court Convicted Husband Under Sections 498A and 304B IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.