Supreme Court Upholds Daughter's Right to Inherit Self-Acquired Property Over Collaterals — Customary Law Affirmed. The court confirmed that the general custom in Punjab favors daughters over collaterals in succession to self-acquired property, requiring collaterals to prove any contrary local custom.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a dispute over the succession rights to the self-acquired property of Gurdial, a deceased Sarswat Brahmin from Pathankot, Gurdaspur. The appellant, a collateral relative, sought a declaration of title to the property, claiming that under local custom, collaterals excluded daughters from inheritance. The respondent, Gurdial's daughter, contested this claim. The trial court initially ruled in favor of the appellant regarding some lands but the High Court later modified this decision, affirming the daughter's right to inherit non-ancestral property. The Supreme Court was tasked with determining whether the local custom indeed allowed collaterals to exclude daughters from succession. The court emphasized that the general custom in Punjab favored daughters, requiring collaterals to prove any contrary local custom. The appellant attempted to rely on the Riwaj-i-am of Gurdaspur, but the court found it unreliable and insufficient to displace the general presumption favoring daughters. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's decision and upholding the daughter's right to inherit her father's self-acquired property.

Headnote

A) Customary Law - Succession Rights - Daughters' Rights to Self-Acquired Property - Indian Succession Act, 1925 - The court held that the general custom in Punjab favors daughters over collaterals in succession to self-acquired property, placing the burden on collaterals to prove any special local custom to the contrary. The appellant failed to discharge this burden, leading to the affirmation of the daughter's right to inherit (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a collateral within the fourth degree can exclude a daughter from inheriting self-acquired property of her father under customary law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court's decision that the daughter was entitled to inherit her father's self-acquired property, as the appellant failed to prove any special local custom to the contrary.

Law Points

  • Customary law
  • succession rights
  • self-acquired property
  • burden of proof
  • Riwaj-i-am
  • presumption of correctness
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Civil Appeal No. 118 of 1953

1955-01-21

Das J.

Rajinder Narain, K. L. Gosain, R. S. Narula, Naunit Lal

Mahant Salig Ram

Musammat Maya Devi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute over succession rights to self-acquired property.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought declaration of title to property.

Filing Reason

Claim of exclusion of daughter from inheritance by collaterals.

Previous Decisions

Trial court ruled partially in favor of appellant; High Court modified decision favoring daughter.

Issues

Whether a collateral can exclude a daughter from inheriting self-acquired property under customary law. Whether the Riwaj-i-am is a reliable document to prove local custom.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that local custom excludes daughters from inheritance. Respondent contended that general custom favors daughters over collaterals.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the general custom in Punjab favors daughters over collaterals in succession to self-acquired property, placing the burden on collaterals to prove any special local custom to the contrary.

Judgment Excerpts

The general custom in Punjab being that a daughter excludes the collaterals from succession to the self-acquired property of her father. The Riwaj-i-am produced is a reliable and a trustworthy document.

Procedural History

The case originated from a suit filed by the appellant for declaration of title, leading to a trial court decision, followed by an appeal to the High Court, and finally to the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Succession Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Dismisses Revision Against Quashing of Process in Matrimonial Criminal Complaint. Vague Allegations Under Section 506 IPC Cannot Sustain Criminal Process Against Wife.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order on Court Fee Valuation in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. The court held that a suit for declaration that an advertisement claiming possession is illegal, with a consequentia...