Case Note & Summary
The case involved a writ petition filed by M/s United Oil Mill Machinery & Spares Pvt. Ltd. against the State of Haryana and others. The petitioner failed to appear in court on two occasions, leading to the court's decision to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. The absence of representation was noted by the court, which indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing the importance of the petitioner's presence in legal proceedings. The decision was made by the Acting Chief Justice and Justice Gurdev Singh on September 13, 2011.
Headnote
A) Civil Procedure - Non-Prosecution - Dismissal of Writ Petition - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The court dismissed the writ petition as no representation was made on behalf of the petitioner even on the second call, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the case. Held that the absence of the petitioner warranted dismissal for non-prosecution (Paras Not mentioned).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner.
Final Decision
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner on two calls.
Law Points
- Dismissal for non-prosecution
- absence of representation
