High Court Quashes Orders in Land Sale Permission Dispute Due to Unsustainable Grounds. Permission for Sale Validated as Consistent with Government Instructions under the Gujarat Tenancy Act, 1972.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute involved a challenge to the orders made by the Collector and the State Government regarding the permission to sell land granted to Shri Harijan Bhoja. The petitioners, successors in title of Shri Harijan Bhoja, contested the orders dated 20th April, 1992, and 27th July, 1992, which set aside the earlier permission granted on 6th January, 1987, for the sale of land. The land in question was granted to Shri Harijan Bhoja on 30th October, 1982, for cultivation as new tenure land. Following an application for sale, the Deputy Collector had permitted the sale on the condition of paying a premium based on the market price. However, the Collector later sought to set aside this permission, citing lack of authority and failure to consider relevant government resolutions. The court analyzed the grounds for cancellation and found them to be unsustainable, noting that the permission was granted in line with government instructions. The court emphasized that the validity of the original land grant was not the issue at hand and that the permission for sale should not have been cancelled based on that. Ultimately, the court quashed the orders of the Collector and the State Government, ruling in favor of the petitioners and making the rule absolute, with costs to be borne by the parties.

Headnote

A) Land Law - Permission to Sell Land - Validity of Permission - Gujarat Tenancy Act, 1972, Section 43 - The court found that the permission granted to sell land was in accordance with government instructions and could not be set aside merely due to non-reference of a specific resolution. The grounds cited for cancellation were deemed unsustainable, leading to the quashing of the impugned orders. Held that the action of the Collector was unjustified (Paras 1-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the orders of the Collector and State Government setting aside the permission to sell land were justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed the orders dated 20th April, 1992, and 27th July, 1992, made by the Collector and State Government respectively, ruling in favor of the petitioners and making the rule absolute.

Law Points

  • Land tenure
  • Government Resolutions
  • Tenancy Act
  • Permission to sell land
  • Authority of Deputy Collector
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Special Civil Application No. 6424 of 1992

2001-08-08

MISS JUSTICE R.M. DOSHIT

MR S.K PATEL, MR SP SEN

PATEL KANJIBHAI LALJIBHAI

STATE OF GUJARAT

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to administrative orders regarding land sale permission.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the orders of the Collector and State Government.

Filing Reason

Aggrieved by the cancellation of permission to sell land.

Previous Decisions

The Collector's order set aside the Deputy Collector's permission, which was later confirmed by the State Government.

Issues

Validity of the Collector's authority to set aside the permission Consideration of relevant government resolutions in granting permission

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the permission was valid and consistent with government instructions. Respondents contended that the Deputy Collector lacked authority and relevant resolutions were not considered.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the permission to sell land was valid as it complied with government instructions, and the grounds for cancellation were not sustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The permission granted by the Deputy Collector was sought to be set-aside on the ground that the Deputy Collector had no authority to make such order. Neither of the said grounds appear to be sustainable. The above referred permission dated 6th January, 1987, appears to be in consonance with the instructions issued by the Government.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a petition challenging the orders of the Collector and State Government after the permission to sell land was set aside.

Acts & Sections

  • Gujarat Tenancy Act, 1972: Section 43
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Factory Classification Under Employees' Provident Funds Act — Composite Factory Determined by Independent Industries.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to SEBI Show Cause Notice in Reorganisation Case — Delay, Review, and Natural Justice Grounds Rejected. Court holds that show cause notice issued after 10 years is not per se barred by laches where allegations ...