High Court Dismisses Review Application in WPC (TA) No.780 of 1987 — No Grounds Established for Review. The court found that the application did not meet the necessary criteria for a review of the order dated 06.08.1992.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a review application filed by the petitioner, Ramjan Saha, seeking to challenge the order dated 06.08.1992. The petitioner approached the High Court of Orissa, represented by Advocate Mr. Kalyan Patnaik, to seek a reconsideration of the earlier decision. Upon examination, the court found that the application did not present any valid grounds for review. Consequently, the court dismissed the interlocutory application, affirming the original order without modification. The court's analysis indicated that the criteria for a successful review were not satisfied, leading to the dismissal of the application.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Review of Orders - Grounds for Review - Not applicable under the circumstances - High Court of Orissa, 2021 - The court found no grounds for reviewing the previous order dated 06.08.1992 and dismissed the application. Held that the application did not meet the necessary criteria for a review (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether there were sufficient grounds for reviewing the order dated 06.08.1992.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the review application, finding no grounds for reconsideration of the order dated 06.08.1992.

Law Points

  • Review of order
  • grounds for review
  • dismissal of application
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

WPC (TA) No.780 of 1987

2021-11-23

DR. B.R. SARANGI

Mr. Kalyan Patnaik

Ramjan Saha

State of Odisha & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review application against a previous court order

Remedy Sought

Review of the order dated 06.08.1992

Filing Reason

Petitioner believed the previous order required reconsideration

Previous Decisions

Order dated 06.08.1992

Issues

Sufficiency of grounds for review

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for reconsideration of the earlier order State Counsel did not support the review

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that without sufficient grounds, a review application cannot be entertained.

Judgment Excerpts

This Court does not find any grounds for review of the order dated 06.08.1992. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands dismissed.

Procedural History

The review application was filed after the order dated 06.08.1992.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Extra Overhead Expenses in Railway Contract Dispute — Clause 17(3) Bars Damages for Delay. The court held that the Arbitral Tribunal's award of compensation for delay was contrary to the express te...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Delay Condonation Application in Arbitration Award Challenge; Scanned Signed Copy of Award Sent by Email Constituted Valid Delivery Under Section 31(5) of Arbitration and Concil...