Supreme Court Upholds Legitimacy of Child Born During Marriage — Conclusive Presumption of Legitimacy Affirmed. The presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act was not successfully displaced by evidence of non-access.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a civil appeal concerning the legitimacy of a child born to the second wife of a man who had multiple marriages. The infant plaintiff, represented by his maternal uncle, sought a half share in the joint family properties, claiming to be the legitimate son of the first defendant. The first defendant denied paternity, alleging misconduct by the plaintiff's mother and claiming non-access during the time of conception. The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, but the High Court reversed this decision, concluding that non-access could be inferred from the circumstances. The Supreme Court examined the evidence and the application of Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, which establishes a conclusive presumption of legitimacy for children born during lawful wedlock. The court found that the High Court erred in its assessment of the evidence regarding access and non-access, emphasizing that the burden of proof lay with the defendant to demonstrate non-access, which he failed to do. The Supreme Court restored the trial court's decision, affirming the legitimacy of the plaintiff and ordering costs to be paid by the first defendant.

Headnote

A) Evidence Law - Presumption of Legitimacy - Conclusive Presumption - Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Section 112 - The presumption of legitimacy is conclusive and can only be displaced by proof of non-access between the parties at a time when the husband could have been the father. The court held that the defendant did not prove non-access, thus affirming the legitimacy of the child (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act was successfully displaced by evidence of non-access.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and restored the trial court's decree, affirming the legitimacy of the plaintiff and ordering costs against the first defendant.

Law Points

  • conclusive presumption of legitimacy
  • non-access
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • burden of proof
  • marital intercourse
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Civil Appeal No. 73 of 1953

1953-12-08

B. Mukherjea, N. H. Bhagwati, B. Jaganadhadas

B. Somayya, D. Munikaniah

Chilukuri Yenkateswarlu

Chilukuri Venkatanarayana

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal regarding the legitimacy of a child born during marriage.

Remedy Sought

The infant plaintiff sought recovery of possession and partition of joint family properties.

Filing Reason

The plaintiff alleged he was the legitimate son of the first defendant.

Previous Decisions

The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, which was reversed by the High Court.

Issues

Whether the presumption of legitimacy was displaced by evidence of non-access.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 was not disproven. The respondent contended that there was no opportunity for marital intercourse during the relevant period.

Ratio Decidendi

The presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act is conclusive and can only be rebutted by clear evidence of non-access, which was not established in this case.

Judgment Excerpts

The presumption under section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act is a conclusive presumption of law which can be displaced only by non-access. The defendant did not succeed in proving that there was no opportunity for intercourse between him and defendant No. 2.

Procedural History

The appeal was against the judgment and decree of the Madras High Court dated 31st January 1950, which reversed the trial court's decision in Original Suit No. 96 of 1944.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Evidence Act: 112
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remits Case for Fresh Consideration in Property Dispute — Misreading of Legal Position by High Court.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Regularization of Services — Upholds Right to Regularization After Long Service. The court found that the appellant's long service and qualifications entitled her to regularization despite her initial appointment bei...