High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Civil Appeal. The court permitted the substitution of legal heirs of the deceased respondent under Order XXII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by Baijnath Oraon against Most Paro and others. The appellant sought to substitute the legal heirs of the deceased respondent, Paro Bano, who passed away on 24.07.2012, followed by her husband's death on 24.08.2012. The appellant's counsel submitted an interlocutory application under Order XXII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for this substitution. The court granted permission for the necessary corrections in the memo of appeal and allowed the substitution of the legal heirs as mentioned in the application. The respondents' counsel indicated that they would file a Vakalatnama on behalf of the proposed substituted legal heirs. The matter was scheduled for hearing on 06.05.2016.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Substitution of Legal Heirs - Legal heirs of deceased respondent to be substituted - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order XXII Rule 4 - The court permitted the substitution of legal heirs of the deceased respondent as per the application filed, allowing necessary corrections in the memo of appeal. Held that the names of legal heirs shall be substituted upon expunging the name of the deceased respondent (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the legal heirs of the deceased respondent can be substituted in the appeal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the substitution of the legal heirs of the deceased respondent as per the interlocutory application and directed necessary corrections in the memo of appeal.

Law Points

  • Substitution of legal heirs
  • Order XXII Rule 4 CPC
  • Interlocutory application
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

S.A. No. 144 of 1989 (R)

2016-02-18

Amitav K. Gupta

A.K. Sahani, Alok Lal

Baijnath Oraon

Most Paro and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal regarding substitution of legal heirs.

Remedy Sought

Substitution of legal heirs of deceased respondent.

Filing Reason

Respondent no. 1, Paro Bano, died and the appellant sought to substitute her legal heirs.

Issues

Substitution of legal heirs in civil proceedings

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for the appellant submitted the need for substitution due to the death of respondent no. 1. Counsel for the respondents indicated filing of Vakalatnama for the proposed legal heirs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court upheld the procedure for substituting legal heirs under Order XXII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, ensuring that the appeal could continue with the appropriate parties.

Judgment Excerpts

Permission accorded. Accordingly, I.A. no. 6221 of 2013 is hereby disposed of.

Procedural History

The interlocutory application was filed under Order XXII Rule 4 for substitution of legal heirs, and the court granted permission for necessary corrections.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XXII Rule 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State in Criminal Appeal Against High Court's Interdiction of Proceedings — High Court's finding of invalid sanction without establishing failure of justice was unsustainable. The court clarified that errors in sanction do not ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Family Court Maintenance Case — Upholds High Court's Order for Maintenance from Date of Application. The court emphasized the need for timely maintenance to prevent destitution, affirming the High Court's ruling to...