High Court Dismisses Application for Benefit Under Criminal Procedure Code Due to Infructuous Nature. Application for Concurrent Sentences Found Unnecessary as Applicant Already Released Considering Prior Orders.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application submitted by Farooq Mirza Hussein Ravi, the appellant, seeking the benefit of Section 427(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The appellant had been convicted in two separate sessions cases for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment in both cases. The sentences were directed to run concurrently as per the common judgment delivered by the High Court on August 1, 1984. Despite the concurrent sentences being confirmed, the appellant absconded for nearly twenty years after being released on parole in April 1984 and was re-arrested in April 2004. After serving the sentence, he was released on August 12, 2008, considering the earlier orders of the court. The court concluded that since the appellant had already received the benefit of the concurrent sentences, the application for further benefit under Section 427(1) was rendered infructuous and was dismissed. The court's decision was based on the fact that the applicant had already been released and thus the application did not require further consideration.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Concurrent Sentences - Application for Benefit - Dismissal of Application - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 427(1) - The applicant sought the benefit of concurrent sentences under Section 427(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which was previously granted. The court found that the application was infructuous as the applicant had already been released considering the earlier orders. Held that the application does not survive any further (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the application for benefit under Section 427(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code should be granted.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application was dismissed as infructuous since the appellant had already been released considering the orders passed by the court.

Law Points

  • Concurrent sentences
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • 1973
  • Section 427
  • Section 428
  • application for benefit
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Criminal Appeal No.748 of 1982

2009-10-16

B.H. Marlappalle, Roshan S. Dalvi

Mr. P.A. Pol

Farooq Mirza Hussein Ravi

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for benefit under the Criminal Procedure Code.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought the benefit of concurrent sentences.

Filing Reason

The appellant filed the application to clarify the status of his sentences.

Previous Decisions

The court had previously confirmed the concurrent nature of the sentences.

Issues

Whether the application for benefit under Section 427(1) should be granted.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for the benefit of concurrent sentences. The state contended that the application was infructuous as the appellant had already been released.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that once the benefit of concurrent sentences had been granted and the appellant released, further applications for the same benefit were unnecessary.

Judgment Excerpts

The applicant sought the benefit of concurrent sentences under Section 427(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, which was previously granted. The court found that the application was infructuous as the applicant had already been released considering the earlier orders.

Procedural History

The appellant submitted an application dated October 8, 2007, which was reiterated in subsequent applications. The appeals were decided by a common judgment on August 1, 1984, and the applicant was sentenced in two sessions cases.

Acts & Sections

  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1973: 427, 428
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Railway Accident Case. The court directed the Railway Administration to pay Rs.4 lakhs as compensation under the amended rules, emphasizing the need for updated monetary values.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Case Due to Inadequate Initial Award. Compensation for Permanent Disability Increased to Reflect Long-Term Impact on Minor's Life.