Patna High Court Dismisses Appeal for Non-Appearance of Appellants — Appeal Not Maintainable. The court found that the appellants failed to pursue the appeal, leading to its dismissal.

High Court: Patna High Court
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by Sarju Singh and his minor children against several respondents. The appeal was registered as First Appeal No.258 of 1984 in the Patna High Court. On 26th September 2012, the court noted that no one appeared on behalf of the appellants. The court referred to an earlier order from 20th May 1996, which directed the memo of appeal to be returned to the appellants for presentation before the appropriate competent court due to valuation issues. Since no one had come forward to receive the memo of appeal for such presentation, the court concluded that the appeal was not maintainable. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Maintainability of Appeal - Dismissal for Non-Appearance - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable due to the absence of the appellants and their failure to receive the memo of appeal since 1996. The court held that the appeal could not proceed without the appellants being present to pursue it (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal is maintainable in the absence of the appellants.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed as not maintainable due to the absence of the appellants and their failure to pursue the appeal since 1996.

Law Points

  • Maintainability of appeal
  • Non-appearance of appellants
  • Dismissal of appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

FA No.258 of 1984

2012-09-26

V. Nath

A.K. Choudhary, S.C. Sinha

Sarju Singh, Manoj Kumar, Chanchala Kumari

Ajodhya Singh, Jagarnath Singh, Srimati Sona Devi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal regarding property or rights

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to challenge a lower court decision

Previous Decisions

Order dated 20th May 1996 directed memo of appeal to be returned

Issues

Maintainability of appeal Non-appearance of appellants

Submissions/Arguments

No arguments presented due to non-appearance of appellants

Ratio Decidendi

An appeal cannot be maintained if the appellants do not appear to pursue it.

Judgment Excerpts

the appeal is not maintainable before this Court, it is dismissed as such.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed in 1984, and an order was made on 20th May 1996 regarding the return of the memo of appeal. No further action was taken by the appellants until the dismissal on 26th September 2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Allows Appellant in Insolvency Proceedings Due to Procedural Irregularities. Tribunal Emphasizes Right to File Additional Affidavit Under Section 7 of the I & B Code, 2016.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Retirement Order — No Evidence of Coercion Established. The court found that the appellant voluntarily retired and accepted all retiral benefits, undermining claims of coercion.