High Court Upholds Regular Salary Entitlement for Employee Under Dying-in-Harness Rules — Fixed Pay Not Applicable. Court Found Appointment Regularized Under Article 309 of the Constitution, Mandating Payment of Regular Salary.

  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a writ petition filed by the petitioner, who sought a writ of mandamus for the payment of salary prescribed for the post of peon, similar to that of other regular employees. The petitioner was initially appointed on a temporary basis on 19.08.1982 under the Dying-in-Harness Rules and was confirmed in 1986. Despite the revision of the pay scale, the petitioner continued to receive a fixed salary instead of a regular salary. The court noted that the Dying-in-Harness Rules, which are applicable to the dependants of government servants who died in service, provided for regular appointments under the provisions of Article 309 of the Constitution of India. The court referred to a precedent from the Allahabad High Court, which affirmed that appointments made under these rules are regular in nature. The court concluded that the petitioner should not have been placed on fixed pay and that the government order dated 16.05.1981 did not apply to him. Consequently, the court issued a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the petitioner the regular salary for the post of peon and to treat him as a regular class-IV employee. The court ordered that the arrears of salary be paid within two months after necessary deductions. No costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Employment Law - Dying-in-Harness Rules - Entitlement to Regular Salary - Uttar Pradesh Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1981 - The petitioner, appointed under the Dying-in-Harness Rules, was entitled to regular salary rather than fixed pay as his appointment was regularized. The court held that the government order dated 16.05.1981 was not applicable to the petitioner, and directed payment of regular salary and arrears (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to the regular salary prescribed for the post of peon under the Dying-in-Harness Rules.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court issued a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the petitioner the regular salary for the post of peon and to treat him as a regular class-IV employee. The court ordered payment of arrears within two months after necessary deductions.

Law Points

  • Writ of mandamus
  • Dying-in-Harness Rules
  • regularization of service
  • fixed pay vs regular salary
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

Writ Petition No. 6678 (S/S) 2001

2003-09-29

P.C. Verma

P.M.N. Singh

Triloki Nath

State of U.P. and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition for salary payment

Remedy Sought

Writ of mandamus for payment of regular salary

Filing Reason

Dispute over salary payment under Dying-in-Harness Rules

Previous Decisions

Court referred to a precedent affirming regular appointments under Dying-in-Harness Rules

Issues

Entitlement to regular salary under Dying-in-Harness Rules Applicability of government order dated 16.05.1981

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for regular salary based on Dying-in-Harness Rules Respondents contended fixed pay was applicable

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that appointments under the Dying-in-Harness Rules are regular in nature and that the petitioner was entitled to regular salary rather than fixed pay.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has prayed to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay salary prescribed for the post of peon. The Dying-in-Harness Rules have been enforced on the appointments of the dependants of the Govt. Servants who died during their services.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed seeking a mandamus for salary payment, heard by the court with arguments from both sides.

Acts & Sections

  • Uttar Pradesh Dying-in-Harness Rules:
  • Constitution of India: Article 309
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Councillors Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act for Defection — No-Confidence Motion Against Mayor Not a 'Split' Under Tenth Schedule Analogous Provisions.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Helmet Rule for Two-Wheeler Riders — Upholds Public Safety Measures. The court found that the rule mandating helmet use is a reasonable restriction for public safety under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.