Case Note & Summary
The judgment pertained to two writ petitions, WPMS No. 3350 of 2001 and WPMS No. 7614 of 2001, which were heard by Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. The parties involved were represented by learned counsel, Sri Manoj Tewari for the petitioner and Sri Gopal Narain for the respondent No. 2. During the proceedings, both counsels agreed that the writ petition No. 3350 (M/S) of 2001 was legally liable to be allowed. Consequently, the court accepted this agreement and allowed the writ petition. Conversely, the grounds for challenge in writ petition No. 7614 (M/S) of 2001 were found to be unsustainable under law, leading to its dismissal. The judgment was delivered on 04.09.2003.
Headnote
A) Writ Jurisdiction - Allowance of Writ Petition - Writ Petition No. 3350 (M/S) of 2001 allowed - Both parties agreed that the petition is liable to be allowed under law - Court accepted the agreement and allowed the writ petition. (Paras Not mentioned). B) Writ Jurisdiction - Dismissal of Writ Petition - Writ Petition No. 7614 (M/S) of 2001 dismissed - Grounds of challenge under law could not sustain, leading to dismissal of the petition. (Paras Not mentioned).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the writ petition No. 3350 (M/S) of 2001 should be allowed and writ petition No. 7614 (M/S) of 2001 should be dismissed.
Final Decision
Writ petition No. 3350 (M/S) of 2001 was allowed, while writ petition No. 7614 (M/S) of 2001 was dismissed.
Law Points
- Writ jurisdiction
- grounds for dismissal
- legal agreement between parties
