High Court Disposes of Writ Petition — Reference to Separate Order in Related Case. Court determined the writ petition's outcome based on findings in another writ petition, ensuring procedural compliance.

In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment pertained to Writ Petition No. 4494 of 2001, which was disposed of by the High Court. The bench, comprising Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. and Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J., referenced a separate order related to Writ Petition No. 4446 of 2001 for the final decision. The court's order was dated 25th March 2004, indicating a procedural resolution without delving into the substantive issues of the case. The judgment did not provide detailed reasoning or background facts, focusing solely on the disposal of the writ petition.

Headnote

A) Writ Jurisdiction - Disposal of Writ Petition - Writ petition disposed of - Not applicable - The court determined that the writ petition was to be disposed of, referencing a separate order in another writ petition. Held that the decision was made in accordance with the court's findings (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the writ petition should be disposed of

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was disposed of by the court.

Law Points

  • Writ jurisdiction
  • disposal of writ petition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

W.P. No. 4494 of 01 (S/S)

2004-03-25

P.C. Verma, Rajesh Tandon

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition

Previous Decisions

Reference to separate order in writ petition No. 4446 of 2001

Issues

Whether the writ petition should be disposed of

Ratio Decidendi

The court disposed of the writ petition based on procedural grounds referencing another case.

Judgment Excerpts

Writ petition is disposed of. For orders, see our order of date passed on separate sheet in writ petition No. 4446 of 2001 (S/S).

Procedural History

Writ petition No. 4494 of 2001 was filed and subsequently disposed of referencing another writ petition.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Employee Reinstatement with Partial Back Wages Due to Illegal Termination. Misinterpretation of Service Regulations Led to Wrong Denial of Relief Under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case — Punitive Damages Set Aside. The court found that punitive damages cannot be awarded without a specific claim and evidence of loss.