High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Election of Managing Committee Due to Irregularities in Electoral Roll. Election Process Declared Void Ab Initio as Addition of Members Violated Devasthan Regulations.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the election of the Managing Committee of Shree Dev Bodgeshwar Sansthan, a Hindu Religious Institution registered under the Devasthan Regulation, 1933. The petitioners challenged the validity of the election held on 09.02.2025, claiming that the electoral roll was manipulated by the illegal addition of 254 members. The last election prior to this was conducted on 13.02.2022, and the process for the new election was initiated by the Administrator of Devalaya on 02.01.2025. The Secretary was required to display the list of Mahajans and allow for objections, but the final list was displayed only on 21.01.2025, which included the additional members. The petitioners argued that the election was marred by gross irregularities and sought to quash the election results. The Administrative Tribunal dismissed their appeal, stating that the petitioners failed to demonstrate how the inclusion of the 254 members materially affected the election outcome. The respondents contended that the enrollment was lawful and that the petitioners did not exhaust their remedies before challenging the election. The court analyzed the provisions of the Devasthan Regulation and found that the election process was fundamentally flawed due to the improper addition of members to the electoral roll. The court held that the election was void ab initio and directed the Administrator to conduct fresh elections excluding the disputed members. The court emphasized that valid electoral processes require adherence to legal provisions, and the failure to do so invalidated the election results.

Headnote

A) Election Law - Validity of Electoral Roll - Irregularities in Electoral Process - Devasthan Regulation, 1933, Articles 25, 26, 30 - The court found that the addition of 254 members to the electoral roll was illegal and not in compliance with the prescribed procedures, thus vitiating the entire election process. Held that the election conducted on the basis of this faulty electoral roll was null and void (Paras 20-22).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the election of the Managing Committee of Shree Dev Bodgeshwar Sansthan was valid given the alleged irregularities in the electoral roll.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the election results, and directed the Administrator to conduct fresh elections excluding the 254 members from the electoral roll within three months.

Law Points

  • Devasthan Regulation
  • election process
  • electoral roll validity
  • objections to electoral roll
  • fresh elections
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (11) 67

Writ Petition No. 755 of 2026 and Writ Petition No. 1109 of 2026

2026-11-04

S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias, Mr. Vineet Surlakar, Ms. Dishanka Vernekar, Ms. Maria Fernandes, Mr. C. Padgaonkar, Mr. Shlok Rai, Ms. Prapti Gaunekar, Mr. S. S. Kantak, Mr. Abhijit Gosavi, Mr. G. Kerkar, Mr. Amey Phadte, Ms. Saicha Desai, Ms. Krupa Naik, Mr. Neehal Vernekar

Shri Santosh Mahadev Vagger, Mr. Anand Pundalik Bhaidkar

The Body of Mazanias/General Body Of Mahajans of Shir Dev Bodgeshwar Saunsthan, Mr. Vaman Jairam Pandit, Mr. Harischandra Sushant Gaonkar, Mr. Shyamsundar Atmaram Pednekar, Mr. Rajendra Shripad Pednekar, Mr. Amey Mahadev Korgaonkar, Mr. Kunal Kiran Dhargalkar, Mr. Vishant Uttam Keni, Mr. Sainath Gopal Raul, Mr. Ramdas L. Pednekar, Administrator of Devalayas and Mamlatdar of Bardez Taluka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the election of the Managing Committee of a religious institution.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the election results and declare them null and void.

Filing Reason

Allegations of illegal enrollment of members and irregularities in the electoral process.

Previous Decisions

The Administrative Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the election results.

Issues

Validity of the electoral roll Procedural compliance in the election process

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the election was based on a fraudulent electoral roll. Respondents contended that the election process followed the prescribed regulations.

Ratio Decidendi

The election process was declared void due to the illegal addition of members to the electoral roll, which violated the Devasthan Regulations and undermined the integrity of the electoral process.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners impugns judgment and order dated 30.05.2025 passed by Administrative Tribunal in Devasthan Appeal No.9/2025 and seeks to quash and set aside entire election of Managing Committee of Shree Dev Bodgeshwar Sansthan held on 09.02.2025 declaring it to be null and void. The election process carried on the basis on such fraudulent or manipulated electoral roll would be void ab initio.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging the election results after the Administrative Tribunal dismissed their appeal regarding the election held on 09.02.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Devasthan Regulation, 1933: Articles 2, 23, 25, 26, 27, 30, 70
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Unfilled MBBS Seat from 2010. The court ruled that an unfilled seat from a previous academic year cannot be carried forward to subsequent years without a legal provision, emphasizing the importance of merit in...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Extension of Bio-Medical Waste Management Contract Without Competitive Bidding. Municipal Corporation's 5-year extension to incumbent contractor held illegal for bypassing tender process under Maharashtra Municipal Corporati...