High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Delay in Filing Written Statement. Court held that the mandatory timeline of 120 days for filing a written statement does not apply to suits transferred from Civil Courts to Commercial Courts.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by M/s. K.C. Construction Company and others against the order of the Commercial Court allowing the respondents to file their written statement beyond the stipulated 120 days. The petitioners, original plaintiffs in a suit for specific performance and damages, challenged the Commercial Court's jurisdiction to condone the delay in filing the written statement. The suit was initially filed in the Civil Court and later transferred to the Commercial Court, where the respondents sought to file their written statement after the 120-day period. The petitioners argued that the Commercial Court lacked jurisdiction to accept the written statement beyond this period, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in M/s. SCG Contracts India Private Limited v. K. S. Chamankar Infrastructure Limited. The respondents contended that the Supreme Court's interpretation in Raj Process Equipments and Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Honest Derivatives Pvt. Ltd. allowed for discretion in such cases. The court analyzed the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act and the Code of Civil Procedure, concluding that the 120-day timeline does not apply to suits transferred from Civil Courts to Commercial Courts. The court emphasized that the Commercial Court has the discretion to set new timelines for filing written statements in transferred suits. Ultimately, the court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Commercial Court's decision to allow the written statement despite the delay.

Headnote

A) Commercial Law - Written Statement Timeline - Applicability of 120-day timeline for filing written statement - Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Section 15 - Court held that the mandatory timeline of 120 days for filing a written statement does not apply to suits transferred from Civil Courts to Commercial Courts, allowing the court discretion to prescribe new timelines (Paras 10-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether defendants in a Civil Suit transferred to a Commercial Court are obligated to follow the 120-day timeline for filing a written statement from the date of service of notice by the Commercial Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Commercial Court's order allowing the written statement despite the delay, and held that the 120-day timeline does not apply to suits transferred from Civil Courts to Commercial Courts.

Law Points

  • Commercial Courts Act
  • Code of Civil Procedure
  • 1908
  • written statement timeline
  • jurisdiction of Commercial Court
  • condonation of delay
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (11) 65

Writ Petition No. 665 of 2024

2026-11-03

S. G. Chapalgaonkar

Mr. Sudin Usgaonkar, Ms. Tanish Mashelkar, Ms. Shehlata Sahani, Mr. J. A. Lobo, Mr. Vedank Naik

M/s. K.C. Construction Company, Mrs. Collette Jeremias D’Souza, Mr. Jeremias D’Souza

Mrs. Arlinda Dos Anjos Dias Torres E Fernandes and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Commercial Court regarding the acceptance of a written statement beyond the prescribed timeline.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the order allowing the respondents to file their written statement beyond 120 days.

Filing Reason

The petitioners contended that the Commercial Court lacked jurisdiction to condone the delay in filing the written statement.

Previous Decisions

The Commercial Court had previously allowed the respondents to file their written statement by condoning the delay.

Issues

Applicability of the 120-day timeline for filing written statements in transferred suits Jurisdiction of the Commercial Court to condone delay

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the Commercial Court had no jurisdiction to condone delay beyond 120 days. Respondents contended that the court had discretion to prescribe new timelines for transferred suits.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the mandatory timeline of 120 days for filing a written statement does not apply to suits transferred from Civil Courts to Commercial Courts, allowing the court discretion to prescribe new timelines.

Judgment Excerpts

Rule made returnable forthwith. The petitioners impugns order dated 27.02.2024 passed by Commercial Court. Court held that the mandatory timeline of 120 days for filing a written statement does not apply to suits transferred from Civil Courts to Commercial Courts.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the Commercial Court's order allowing the respondents to file their written statement beyond the 120-day period. The suit was initially filed in the Civil Court and later transferred to the Commercial Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Commercial Courts Act, 2015: 15, 16
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order V Rule 1, Order VIII Rule 1, Order VIII Rule 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remits Income Tax Deduction Case for Fresh Consideration Due to High Court Errors. High Court's Order Set Aside for Failing to Consider Relevant Precedent and Misunderstanding Factual Context.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition of Married Daughter for Dependent Identity Card of Ex-Serviceman Father. Gender-Discriminatory Policy Denying Married Daughter Status While Granting to Married Son Struck Down as Unconstitutional Under Articles...