High Court Quashes FIR Against Advocate in Domestic Violence Dispute — No Cognizable Offence Established.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a Criminal Writ Petition filed by an Advocate seeking to quash an FIR registered against her under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Petitioner was named Accused No. 3 in the FIR, which arose from a dispute involving Respondent No. 2 and another accused, stemming from ongoing domestic violence proceedings initiated by Manjali Gadekar against Respondent No. 2. The FIR was lodged following an altercation that occurred on 04.02.2026, where the Petitioner was present to provide moral support to her client, Manjali Gadekar. The Petitioner argued that her presence was justified and that the allegations were an attempt to pressure her as an Advocate. The Respondents contended that the Petitioner should not have been present at the shared household given the animosity between the parties. The Court analyzed the FIR and the chargesheet, ultimately concluding that the allegations did not satisfy the legal requirements for a cognizable offence against the Petitioner. The Court emphasized the role of lawyers and the need for discretion in their professional conduct. Consequently, the Court quashed the FIR and all related proceedings against the Petitioner, ruling in her favor and ensuring that she would not face criminal charges in relation to the dispute involving her client.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Quashing of FIR - No Cognizable Offence Established - Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - The Court found that the FIR did not disclose any cognizable offence against the Petitioner, an Advocate, and thus quashed the FIR and subsequent proceedings. Held that the presence of the Advocate at the disputed site did not constitute a cognizable offence (Paras 20-22).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR against the Petitioner discloses a cognizable offence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the Petition, quashed the FIR No. 25 of 2026, Chargesheet No. 34 of 2026, and all subsequent criminal proceedings against the Petitioner.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR
  • Article 226
  • Section 528
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • 2023
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act
  • 2005
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (11) 62

Criminal Writ Petition No. 194 of 2026

2026-11-02

Ashwin D. Bhobe

2026:BHC-GOA:2343

A. Gosavi, Preetam Talaulikar, Sanjay Mangeshkar

State of Goa, Smt. Ramavati Gadekar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition seeking to quash an FIR against an Advocate.

Remedy Sought

The Petitioner sought to quash the FIR and subsequent charges.

Filing Reason

The FIR was filed following an altercation involving the Petitioner and other parties.

Previous Decisions

The Trial Court had issued summons based on the chargesheet filed.

Issues

Whether the FIR disclosed a cognizable offence against the Petitioner.

Submissions/Arguments

The Petitioner argued her presence was for moral support and not for participation in the offence. The Respondents contended that the Petitioner should not have been present at the shared household.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the FIR did not disclose any cognizable offence against the Advocate, emphasizing the need for discretion in legal practice.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned FIR and the material forming part of the chargesheet, taken at face value, do not satisfy the ingredients of Sections 329, 352, 115(2) and 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in relation to the Petitioner. The better part of valour is discretion; the Petitioner lost sight of this.

Procedural History

The Petitioner filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 seeking to quash the FIR and chargesheet after being summoned by the Trial Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita: 528
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Review Application in Civil Dispute — No Grounds for Review Established. The review application failed to demonstrate any error apparent on the face of the record or new evidence justifying a review under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Order Reducing Penalty for Misconduct in Service. The High Court's substitution of punishment was found to be an overreach of judicial discretion, disregarding the gravity of the misconduct under the Central Reserve...