High Court of Bombay Upholds Petitioner Society's Challenge Against Membership Grant to Private Company. The Deputy Registrar's Order to Grant Ordinary Membership to Respondent No. 4 was Found to Exceed Jurisdiction as No Application for Membership was Made.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved a challenge by the Petitioner society against orders from the Deputy Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar regarding membership status of Respondent No. 4, a private limited company. The society, Worli Sagar CHSL, was formed to secure government land for residential purposes and had constructed shops under specific conditions. Respondent No. 4, initially admitted as a nominal member, sought ordinary membership after acquiring rights to several shops. The Deputy Registrar allowed this request, leading to the society's petitions. The society argued that Respondent No. 4 had not applied for membership and was merely a licensee, thus the Deputy Registrar lacked jurisdiction. The court analyzed the provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, particularly Sections 22 and 23, and the implications of the 2019 amendment abolishing nominal membership. The court found that the Deputy Registrar's actions were beyond his jurisdiction and upheld the society's challenge, emphasizing that nominal members cannot be automatically converted to ordinary members without proper application and adherence to the governing rules. The court ultimately directed that the Deputy Registrar's order be set aside, reaffirming the society's rights and the conditions under which membership could be granted.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Societies Law - Membership Classification - Jurisdiction of Deputy Registrar - Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, Sections 22(2), 23(2) - The Deputy Registrar's order to grant ordinary membership to Respondent No. 4 was challenged on grounds of jurisdiction, as Respondent No. 4 had not applied for membership. The court held that the Deputy Registrar exceeded his jurisdiction by upgrading the membership status without a valid application (Paras 9-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Deputy Registrar had jurisdiction to grant ordinary membership to Respondent No. 4 despite its status as a nominal member.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court upheld the challenge by the Petitioner society, finding that the Deputy Registrar exceeded his jurisdiction in granting ordinary membership to Respondent No. 4 without a valid application. The court set aside the orders of the Deputy Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar.

Law Points

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • nominal membership
  • ordinary membership
  • jurisdiction of Deputy Registrar
  • government land allotment policy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (11) 13

Writ Petition No. 14533 of 2026 & Group

2026-11-04

Sandeep V. Marne

Mr. Pradeep Thorat, Mr. Aniesh Jadhav, Mr. Nikhil V. Adkine, Mr. Shubham B. Choudhari, Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar, Dr. Abhinav Chandrachud, Mr. Drupad Patil, Ms. Ashwini Purav

Vaitarna Bheema Worli Sagar CHSL

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge against membership grant orders by the Deputy Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner society sought to set aside the orders granting ordinary membership to Respondent No. 4.

Filing Reason

The Deputy Registrar's order was claimed to be without jurisdiction as Respondent No. 4 had not applied for membership.

Previous Decisions

The Deputy Registrar had allowed appeals from Respondent No. 4, upgrading its membership status.

Issues

Whether the Deputy Registrar had jurisdiction to grant ordinary membership to Respondent No. 4. Whether nominal membership can be converted to ordinary membership without a formal application.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that Respondent No. 4 was merely a licensee and had not applied for membership. Respondent No. 4 contended that it had acquired rights and should be treated as an ordinary member.

Ratio Decidendi

The Deputy Registrar's jurisdiction is limited to cases where a valid application for membership is made; nominal members cannot be upgraded to ordinary members without following proper procedures as outlined in the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

Judgment Excerpts

Rule in all the ten Petitions. Rule is made returnable forthwith. The Deputy Registrar has allowed the Appeals preferred by Respondent No.4 by treating the same as appeals filed under Section 23(2) of the MCS Act. The court held that the Deputy Registrar exceeded his jurisdiction by upgrading the membership status without a valid application.

Procedural History

The Petitioner society filed ten writ petitions challenging the orders of the Deputy Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar regarding membership status of Respondent No. 4, which were taken up for final disposal.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: 22(2), 23(2)
  • Maharashtra Ownership of Flats (Regulation of the Promotion of Construction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act, 1963:
  • Transfer of Property Act, 1882: 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court's Order on Arbitration Award — Lack of Evidence for Loss of Profit. The arbitral award was found to be perverse and illegal due to insufficient evidence supporting the claim for loss of profit.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Seniority of Temporary Medical Officers in Uttar Pradesh Medical Services — Clarifies Applicability of 1945 Rules.